This can be read as "the HCA overestimates actual performance". I am sure this is not what you meant...Date: 11/2/2004 9:27:34 AM
Author: Paul-Antwerp
In a way, you should take the HCA-score as indicating the theoretically highest possible score if all other criteria are met.
Hi Garry,Date: 11/2/2004 6:29:19 AM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
Most stones under 1.0 are tending to shallow (low spread panalty) and if you can focus as close up as 6 inches you may find these stones appear too dark.
Valeria,Date: 11/2/2004 11:32:17 AM
Author: valeria101
This can be read as ''the HCA overestimates actual performance''. I am sure this is not what you meant...Date: 11/2/2004 9:27:34 AM
Author: Paul-Antwerp
In a way, you should take the HCA-score as indicating the theoretically highest possible score if all other criteria are met.
ThanksDate: 11/2/2004 41:25 PM
Author: Paul-Antwerp
Valeria,Date: 11/2/2004 11:32:17 AM
Author: valeria101
This can be read as ''the HCA overestimates actual performance''. I am sure this is not what you meant...Date: 11/2/2004 9:27:34 AM
Author: Paul-Antwerp
In a way, you should take the HCA-score as indicating the theoretically highest possible score if all other criteria are met.
In a way, the HCA-score is always over-estimated, although with this being a relative score between 0 and 10, this does not make any difference.