- Joined
- Aug 22, 2012
- Messages
- 7,329
What is it in the extortion attempt about which you need more "proof" ?
The part where Trump held up the military aid that had already been granted by Congress; vetted by the Pentagon; and signed off on by Donald Trump himself?
or
The part where Donald Trump told President Zellinsky that he would have to go to a microphone and announce that he was going to investigate the 2016 Democratic server and the Bidens in order to unfreeze that aid and to get a meeting at The White House?
What would you accept as "proof'?
PS-Nothing could restore that days without military aid or the lack of presence of President Trump at Zelinksy's inauguration, which he had begged for, and which Trump had denied him.
Multiple people have testified under oath that Trump broke the law. And the grounds for impeachment is less than what is needed for a criminal trial. Sorry if you are emotionally attached to Trump or what he stands for, but we can't have a corrupt person be the president. I'm a boring middle aged lady but I and many others like me will March the streets if justice is subverted. May God help us all.Proof of intent is absolutely what is necessary. This is serious and bipartisan support is necessary or it is a sham.
Republicans look at every case against Trump that has gone nowhere and see this as just another example.
Multiple people have testified under oath that Trump broke the law. And the grounds for impeachment is less than what is needed for a criminal trial. Sorry if you are emotionally attached to Trump or what he stands for, but we can't have a corrupt person be the president. I'm a boring middle aged lady but I and many others like me will March the streets if justice is subverted. May God help us all.
Multiple people have testified under oath that Trump broke the law.
As of today has it been announced by the Ukrainians?Karl, are you aware that most of your arguments sound like Fox News rhetoric and that you aren’t addressing the fact that Trump withheld aid from a vulnerable country in order to get them to announce that they were investigating his political rival?
Agree, but the problem is the Dems know that they don't have a candidate who can beat Trump, so they must impeach him before the election.If Dems want to impeach the President of the United States they'd better be able to prove intent, especially if they want bipartisan support. This is no joke and their personal feelings about Trump or "Trumpsters" aren't relevant.
Perhaps concentrating on winning the election would be a better idea.
So if Biden were to win in 2020 you would have no problem if Congress removed him from office?However for something to be an impeachable offense it does not need to break the law. And what Trump did was certainly an impeachable offense.
So if Biden were to win in 2020 you would have no problem if Congress removed him from office?
Hey Deb.I asked Karl what would constitute proof to him and he never replied. See below for exact wording of our exchange..
IYO, Is this impeachable?Of course not, if Biden did something impeachable.
It's about right and wrong.
@redwood66, I don’t understand the need to hang on to whether or not DT had intent. People break the law all of the time without intent and they still have to face the consequences of their actions. Intent is irrelevant as far as I can see.
IYO, Is this imp
You are spreading false rumours. Your video states fabrications .Check your facts. You are probably doing the work of the Russians, which Dr. Hill warned us all not to do.Vladimir Putin is behind this false narrative.
![]()
Fact check: What Joe and Hunter Biden actually did in Ukraine
The facts are getting lost in the frenzy.www.axios.com
@redwood66, I don’t understand the need to hang on to whether or not DT had intent. People break the law all of the time without intent and they still have to face the consequences of their actions. Intent is irrelevant as far as I can see.
Vladimir Putin is laughing at this sh*tshow that the US has become with the two sides at each other's throats. It doesn't matter who is in charge when that happens.
Does truth not matter in our country anymore?
Oh. My. God. Did anyone listen to Trump on Fox and Friends this morning? I don't understand how ANYONE can listen to that and think he is in his right mind.
If the Dems were so serious about the law HRC would be in prison a long time ago.I watched much of the hearings the past few days. I don’t know how anyone listening to Fiona Hill and David Holmes yesterday, could not see how serious this is. The facts keep getting worse for the President and the case is getting stronger for impeachment.
Does truth not matter in our country anymore?