Good deal. That will help a lot. I take it they just got this in?Date: 2/8/2007 11:27:28 AM
Author: acbutk
WF is supposed to get me one tomorrow.
The reason I asked is because it didn''t show up on there yesterday when I did a search and found that other G SI2 that I linked.Date: 2/8/2007 11:59:07 AM
Author: acbutk
It''s not in-house. I think it''s just been listed recently. Why do you ask?
Thanks. That kinda surprises me, just cuz it looked so good in the high mag pics. At least I know now, if recommending to anyone else.Date: 2/8/2007 12:17:44 PM
Author: acbutk
They said the other SI2 wasn''t eyeclean. They said the feathers weren''t hazardous to the diamond. Supposedly, this SI2 is eyeclean. The grading report says it is indented natural and natural. Could you shed some light on that?
Good post Daniel. If you like strong blue fluorescence, a large table, or a "K" color, who are we to tell you otherwise? That''s why there''s anDate: 2/7/2007 3:21:10 PM
Author: DBM
Pricescope offers a wealth of information and certainly can be overwhelming but just remember this isn''t neuro surgery. Most of the comments and concepts mentioned on the forums about ideal proportions and colors and sizes, etc etc etc are just there to introduce you to the concepts and the issues to be more informed. If you ''make a mistake'' so to speak and buy a diamond that is too deep or too big of a table or too yellow or whatever it''s most likely that your fiance will be thrilled and think it''s beautiful as well if you thought so upon seeing it. It''s not supposed to be an unenjoyable experience
Outside of it facing up a bit smaller, it looks good. But I can''t see your pics, red x.Date: 2/9/2007 4:35:47 PM
Author: acbutk
The Sarin report and Ideal Scope are in. Check these images out, let me know what you think.
.95 carat
G color
SI2
6.29x6.32x3.90
depth: 61.8
Table: 55
Crown angle : 34.6
Pavilion angle: 40.7
cutlet size: .6
girdle slightly thick