Gcal report decision

[free-user]

I have to mmd that I'm deciding on. The partial reports are provided. One report does not offer a "red" hearts and arrow report. However the one that does shows a almost perfect semetry. I like the small differences in angles more on the one with less report but I worry about semetry...can the black and white images provide any info regarding the semetry?

 

[free-user]

Ok, I'll rephrase this: which one stands out more given the information:

Gem Certification & Assurance Lab

www.gcalusa.com

Gem Certification & Assurance Lab

www.gcalusa.com

 

[AprilBaby]

Both score well, the 1.6 is cleaner.

 

[free-user]

Both score well, the 1.6 is cleaner.

I'm curious to hear what you think about the hearts and arrow from the info provided.

 

[OoohShiny]

The black-and-white image of the first stone looks like the symmetry is decent, from what I can see.

 

[purecarats]

Both of these stones look like they have good hearts and arrows actually.

Overall, I'd say the 1.60ct stone is better than the 1.57ct stone due to the inclusions on the bottom right of the latter!

I hope this information is useful!