katharath
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2013
- Messages
- 2,850
Hey there,
You'd asked me about the stone I got from Jim McCormick...I took several pics to show you, but unfortunately I only have one pic saved from Jim to compare to. He only listed the one pic of the gem, although there was a video as well - I don't have the link saved though.
I think the main issue with Jim's pics (IMO) is that somehow it almost seems like his pics highlight any teeny little flaw in the gem, while almost minimizing the stone's good qualities! I don't really know how else to describe what I mean, sorry, lol. I honestly think he's trying to show his gems as accurately as possible so that no one is surprised by any inclusions, flaws, etc - but what it kind of ends up doing is making for "meh" pics, if you know what I mean.
And let me add again that I found Jim's customer service and communication to be excellent! I would definitely buy from him again.
I'm not sure that my pics are actually "better" than Jim's are of this gem; they're not nearly as close up, bc I don't have a camera capable of taking accurate pics that close up. These pics were taken with my iphone in natural indirect daylight, except for one pics which was taken at night in indoor lighting, which I will note.
The gem:
a 1 carat Mali garnet, oval Portuguese cut. It does show some sugary type inclusions. The color is rather remarkable for a Mali, IMO. I own 4, and this is the only Mali I own that shows this bright green, rather lime-y color, which is actually very pretty! The gem does show a bit of shift as most garnets do, but the main color is this beautiful green. First pics is Jim's; all others are mine.




You'd asked me about the stone I got from Jim McCormick...I took several pics to show you, but unfortunately I only have one pic saved from Jim to compare to. He only listed the one pic of the gem, although there was a video as well - I don't have the link saved though.
I think the main issue with Jim's pics (IMO) is that somehow it almost seems like his pics highlight any teeny little flaw in the gem, while almost minimizing the stone's good qualities! I don't really know how else to describe what I mean, sorry, lol. I honestly think he's trying to show his gems as accurately as possible so that no one is surprised by any inclusions, flaws, etc - but what it kind of ends up doing is making for "meh" pics, if you know what I mean.
And let me add again that I found Jim's customer service and communication to be excellent! I would definitely buy from him again.
I'm not sure that my pics are actually "better" than Jim's are of this gem; they're not nearly as close up, bc I don't have a camera capable of taking accurate pics that close up. These pics were taken with my iphone in natural indirect daylight, except for one pics which was taken at night in indoor lighting, which I will note.
The gem:
a 1 carat Mali garnet, oval Portuguese cut. It does show some sugary type inclusions. The color is rather remarkable for a Mali, IMO. I own 4, and this is the only Mali I own that shows this bright green, rather lime-y color, which is actually very pretty! The gem does show a bit of shift as most garnets do, but the main color is this beautiful green. First pics is Jim's; all others are mine.



