EXPERTS: Which of these two 2ct diamonds for white setting

[william_v]

Help me. I can''t decide between these two diamonds.

http://whiteflash.com/round/Round-cut-diamond-66481.htmhttp://www.abazias.com/database/NewDiamondInfo.asp?stock=28910749
Carat Weight: 2.01 Color: I Clarity: VS2 Depth%: 60.7 Table %: 57 Symmetry: EX Polish: EX Girdle: M- Culet: N Fluorescence: N Measurements: 8.17x8.21x4.97 Cut Grade: Ideal

or

http://www.bluenile.com/diamonds_details.asp?pid=LD00343550&keyword_search_value=ld00343550
Carat weight: 2.02 Cut: Very Good Color: I Clarity: VS2 Depth %: 60.2% Table %: 57%
Symmetry: Very good Polish: Very good Girdle: Medium to slightly thick
Culet: None Fluorescence: None Measurements: 8.16 x 8.18 x 4.92 mm

Which of these are the best choice. Also are they both good diamond. Hopefully they are not shallow/shallow.

 

[JulieN]

The Blue Nile stone is shallow/shallow.

The Whiteflash stone is not.

 

[kcoursolle]

If you want to save money, here is a possibility.
http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?cid=130&item=1004846

 

[william_v]

thanks

 

[william_v]

Need more input please

 

[Ellen]

The WF stone has possibilities, but you need more info for us to comment. IS image, H&A pics, Sarin, etc.

Also the one kc posted has possibilties. Would need IS image on that at least.

 

[hoorray]

Both the Whiteflash and the James Allen stones look nice. Is the WF stone in house, or would they need to bring it in for more info? You need to find out about the inclusions in the James Allen stone, and should ask for an idealscope picture of both of them. I would skip the Bluenile stone. It is too shallow.