shape
carat
color
clarity

Engagement Rings

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

deadbigtoe

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 17, 2004
Messages
24

okay after much frustration i have finally chose a diamond. now a whole other headache is forming. I chose a .91 ideal cut round E/SI1 and have narrowed down the setting to three. Which setting will be best for my diamond? My girlfriend is 5''7 124lbs if that helps any and her ring size is between 4.5-6 (Im sure that will be another headache). While she was at school i took a ring of hers and rushed to a jewelry to size it. He said it was a 4.5. That size seems very small to me. Here are the three settings.


http://whiteflash.com/Engagement-Rings/Styles/Solitaire/Platinum-6-Prong-Tiffany-Style_667.htm


http://whiteflash.com/Engagement-Rings/Styles/Solitaire/Platinum-Sleek-Lines-Solitaire_688.htm


http://whiteflash.com/Engagement-Rings/Styles/Solitaire/Platinum-4-Prong-Tiffany-Style_608.htm







 

Hest88

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jan 22, 2003
Messages
4,357

If she''s that height and only 127 lbs I wouldn''t be surprised if she''s a 4.5. However, it really depends on how fleshy or bony her fingers are.


Obviously, it''s more important which style of ring she likes than what I like. My preference is the 2nd one; I''ve never been fond of the typical Tiffany style. But, anyway to find out what she prefers?


 

NewShiny

Shiny_Rock
Joined
Jan 9, 2004
Messages
300
I vote for #3.
 

alexah

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Feb 14, 2004
Messages
1,235
Date: 11/11/2004 6:43:47 PM
Author:deadbigtoe

Which setting will be best for my diamond? My girlfriend is 5''7 124lbs if that helps any and her ring size is between 4.5-6.

Ok- that''s funny!! 124 - sure she didn''t eat anything salty today? 124

9.gif


I like #1 or #2 best

35.gif

 

suzannecallison

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 10, 2004
Messages
55

I vote for #2. It''s easier for her to get her hand in your back pocket. Especially if she is 5''6 and 120lbs.

2.gif



Suzanne

 

theinquisitor

Rough_Rock
Joined
Sep 6, 2004
Messages
82
I''m lovin'' #2!! Purely personal preference. I just like the look and the lines.
 

fortheloveofdiamonds

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Oct 8, 2004
Messages
1,279
If I''d have to choose I''d choose #2. The setting is good too because it is plain and can be resized easily if need be, but the size does *sound* good for her size.
 

deadbigtoe

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 17, 2004
Messages
24

I vote for #2. It''s easier for her to get her hand in your back pocket. Especially if she is 5''6 and 120lbs



? I dont get it. There is no way for me to find out what she likes, she is very simple and im sure she would like either of the 3. Well the Sleek Line setting make my diamond look bigger?

 

Diamondsbybree

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
575

I REALLY like #2. I looks classy, elegant, and not so common as the typical tiffany.


emteeth.gif

 

suzannecallison

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 10, 2004
Messages
55
Date: 11/11/2004 8
6.gif
2:46 PM
Author: deadbigtoe


I vote for #2. It''s easier for her to get her hand in your back pocket. Especially if she is 5''6 and 120lbs







? I dont get it. There is no way for me to find out what she likes, she is very simple and im sure she would like either of the 3. Well the Sleek Line setting make my diamond look bigger?


I like the sleek line because the setting curves up to the diamond, and makes a less stick-up silhouette. Does that make sense? Therefore, in some situations(depending on how tight your jeans are)she can easily slip her hand in your back pocket without catching the prongs. It was a very tiny joke on a very serious subject. I am sorry.

15.gif



Suzanne



Plus, I deliberately misquoted her height and weight. I am off to stand in the corner now.

35.gif

 

researcher

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 27, 2004
Messages
2,460
I''m the same height/weight and have the same ring size (4.5)--what a coincidence!
3.gif
Anyhoo, I like #3. It''s the classic look, and really the most elegant and simple. #2 is nice, but not nearly as pretty as #3.
 

AGBF

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Jan 26, 2003
Messages
22,146
I would like to see more photos of the rings. For instance, how does #3 look head on? Is that knife edge going to be very thin next to the stone and make the stone look bigger? How high is #2 going to be? I''d like a straight side shot to compare it to 1 and 3. Can you get more photos?
 

deadbigtoe

Rough_Rock
Joined
Oct 17, 2004
Messages
24
I wish i could, but those are the only ones on the website. If someone comes across pics of these settings please post them. thanks
 

icelady

Brilliant_Rock
Joined
Nov 25, 2003
Messages
1,030

Hi DBT,



I am 5''7" and 127 lbs and my ring size is 4.5! So 4.5 is probably right.


I really like #2 because it is unique and very attractive from the side.


Let us know what you end up with!

2.gif

 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top