Engagement ring!
- Thread starter pixie123
- Start date
- Status
elle_chris
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2004
- Messages
- 3,511
Pixie- It''s fab and looks perfect on your hand!
Welcome to the 5 stone ring club!
I think a wide band is a great idea (and what i do as well).
A cartier style rolling ring is also a great choice but if you''re going to do something like that, make sure the bands are wider or it won''t look right.
A beverly k band.. eh not so much. Too much bling and competition with the 5 stone imo.
I think a wide band is a great idea (and what i do as well).
A cartier style rolling ring is also a great choice but if you''re going to do something like that, make sure the bands are wider or it won''t look right.
A beverly k band.. eh not so much. Too much bling and competition with the 5 stone imo.
So Excited
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2009
- Messages
- 324
Beautiful Ring!! Love the profile of the diamonds
Londongirl1
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2009
- Messages
- 695
Gorgeous ring
Bella_mezzo
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2009
- Messages
- 5,760
Oohhh, your ring is so pretty! Congrats on your engagement.
Wow! Many thanks for all the nice comments!
Gleam - It''s definitely a comfortable ring. I''m a scientist and a pediatrician, so I''m either doing a lot with my hands in lab or picking up babies/toddlers. That''s part of the reason why I went for a ring with diamonds close to the hand. The ring is snug enough so that it won''t spin, but not too tight. As long as you make sure the size is right, I think you''ll find it a comfortable fit. The diamonds spill over a tiny bit to the sides of my finger, but I really don''t notice it. The spillover depends on what size diamonds you''ll be getting. I was thinking of 40 point stones, but Liza at WF recommended this set because it was more cohesive and more uniform in quality than the 40 pointer they had at that time. Also, I tried a 40 point Memoire 5 stone ring on in a B&M store and didn''t note a huge difference between the 0.33 and 0.4 stone set. It was a little larger, but the ACAs are cut so well that the brilliance (especially under incandescent light) minimizes the difference between 33 points and 40 points.
Hope that helps!
Gleam - It''s definitely a comfortable ring. I''m a scientist and a pediatrician, so I''m either doing a lot with my hands in lab or picking up babies/toddlers. That''s part of the reason why I went for a ring with diamonds close to the hand. The ring is snug enough so that it won''t spin, but not too tight. As long as you make sure the size is right, I think you''ll find it a comfortable fit. The diamonds spill over a tiny bit to the sides of my finger, but I really don''t notice it. The spillover depends on what size diamonds you''ll be getting. I was thinking of 40 point stones, but Liza at WF recommended this set because it was more cohesive and more uniform in quality than the 40 pointer they had at that time. Also, I tried a 40 point Memoire 5 stone ring on in a B&M store and didn''t note a huge difference between the 0.33 and 0.4 stone set. It was a little larger, but the ACAs are cut so well that the brilliance (especially under incandescent light) minimizes the difference between 33 points and 40 points.
Hope that helps!
- Status
300x240.png)