I bought this diamond online and ran its proportions through the Holloway Cut Adviser and am concerned about its poor score (Total Visual Performance 4.0 - Good - Only if price is your main criterion), considering it is GIA triple-excellent.
Here is the link to the diamond with photos/videos: http://www.zoara.com/diamonds/p_rou...tm_source=rarecarat&utm_medium=cpc#?p=8491600
The proportions: 62% depth, 58% table, 35.5° crown angle, 41° pavilion angle
I've also attached pictures of the ring, taken indoors under fluorescent office lighting. To my untrained eye it looks good, but should I be concerned that its proportions indicate poor light performance? I have thought about going for an Ideal Cut instead of an Excellent cut but that would mean a smaller stone to fit into my budget... Thoughts? Thanks in advance for any help!

Here is the link to the diamond with photos/videos: http://www.zoara.com/diamonds/p_rou...tm_source=rarecarat&utm_medium=cpc#?p=8491600
The proportions: 62% depth, 58% table, 35.5° crown angle, 41° pavilion angle
I've also attached pictures of the ring, taken indoors under fluorescent office lighting. To my untrained eye it looks good, but should I be concerned that its proportions indicate poor light performance? I have thought about going for an Ideal Cut instead of an Excellent cut but that would mean a smaller stone to fit into my budget... Thoughts? Thanks in advance for any help!

