David,
Thanks for responding. Yes, I get your meaning. Would there be anything you would change about your 2A standard if price were no object? I seem to recall reading that your numbers were based upon a combination of best stone quality coupled with an eye towards cost. Or am I remembering incorrectly? Would you be more rigid about numbers if price were not even a consideration? I appreciate your input in particular, as I am using your standard to search for stones, and will continue to do so. Thanks again,
Edward di Lamporecchio
Thanks for responding. Yes, I get your meaning. Would there be anything you would change about your 2A standard if price were no object? I seem to recall reading that your numbers were based upon a combination of best stone quality coupled with an eye towards cost. Or am I remembering incorrectly? Would you be more rigid about numbers if price were not even a consideration? I appreciate your input in particular, as I am using your standard to search for stones, and will continue to do so. Thanks again,
Edward di Lamporecchio
300x240.png)