Emerald Cut
.93C
VVS1
E Clarity
6.47x4.81x3.26
table=59%
depth=67.8%
Crown Height= 11.2%
Girdle = 1.2%
VG Polish/Sym
4500
EC
.96C VVS2 F
6.72x5.10x3.16
Table = 67.9%
depth = 61%
Crown = 11.4%
girdle = .5-2.8
G/VG Polish Sym
4300
EC
.98 VS2 G MED Blue Flor.
6.82x5.15x3.13
Table = 62.9%
depth = 60.8%
girdle = 1.2%
Ex Polish / VG Sym
3700
Any thoughts on these Emerald Cuts? Im not in a rush, but it would be nice to be done. The first, does not have a super cut and is the smallest and pricey but otherwise is nice. The second, is ok, again not a super cut, the thin girdle bugs me. The third one may look out of place but it is a 1A ideal cut, as per the AGA cut grading scale. The blue flor and VS2 sorta scares me though..
Any comments? Wild opinions?
.93C
VVS1
E Clarity
6.47x4.81x3.26
table=59%
depth=67.8%
Crown Height= 11.2%
Girdle = 1.2%
VG Polish/Sym
4500
EC
.96C VVS2 F
6.72x5.10x3.16
Table = 67.9%
depth = 61%
Crown = 11.4%
girdle = .5-2.8
G/VG Polish Sym
4300
EC
.98 VS2 G MED Blue Flor.
6.82x5.15x3.13
Table = 62.9%
depth = 60.8%
girdle = 1.2%
Ex Polish / VG Sym
3700
Any thoughts on these Emerald Cuts? Im not in a rush, but it would be nice to be done. The first, does not have a super cut and is the smallest and pricey but otherwise is nice. The second, is ok, again not a super cut, the thin girdle bugs me. The third one may look out of place but it is a 1A ideal cut, as per the AGA cut grading scale. The blue flor and VS2 sorta scares me though..
Any comments? Wild opinions?