In my continued quest to find a nice emerald at a good price, I have been given info/suggestions by vendors of a few different emeralds with depths that seem quite deep to me.
However, I have been told that that table, crown height and other cut parameters still can make a deep emerald a very attractive make. I wonder how much of this is reasonably correct, and how much is hype. These stones are in the 70-73 % depth range, but they feature good table sizes in the 59-64% range, with crown height percentages in the 13-16% range. I know that these numbers are only part of the overall story, but I trying to determine whether this advice is on the right track.
Does this make sense, and are these Emeralds with good table and crown numbers still worthy of consideration, despite their high depth percentages.
However, I have been told that that table, crown height and other cut parameters still can make a deep emerald a very attractive make. I wonder how much of this is reasonably correct, and how much is hype. These stones are in the 70-73 % depth range, but they feature good table sizes in the 59-64% range, with crown height percentages in the 13-16% range. I know that these numbers are only part of the overall story, but I trying to determine whether this advice is on the right track.
Does this make sense, and are these Emeralds with good table and crown numbers still worthy of consideration, despite their high depth percentages.