shape
carat
color
clarity

EC re-cut/Asscher re-cut?

caligirlatheart

Rough_Rock
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
9
Hello all,

I have been reading PS for several months and have really appreciated all the information available here. I have recently been reading the thread about the MRB re-cut by SS into an OEC with much interest. I have also been soaking up information about Asschers and learning how difficult it is to find one with an excellent cut. I have searched for topics on re-cutting Asschers or re-cutting ECs into Asschers or just re-cutting ECs for better light return without much luck. That's why I'm emerging from lurkdom to pose some questions....

I have heard from one vendor that re-cutting an Asscher is a tricky business and not advised. Another vendor did not seem to reject the idea of re-cutting an Asscher or re-cutting an EC into an Asscher out of hand. Is it just a question of finding the right cutter for a project like this? Who are some of the best Asscher resources for cutting?

With RBs being re-cut to AGS 000 specs etc. and at least one PSer's MRB being re-cut into a lovely OEC, I can't help thinking of the possibilities. If one were to find an EC (4.0+ cts) with a so-so cut could an Asscher renovation take place? Maybe not even cutting the stone totally square but creating an elongated Asscher appearance like the Krupp/Liz Taylor diamond? Would the original stone need a minimum depth, table size and/or crown height combination to even make this possible?

Finding a vintage Asscher that has the depth and small table/high crown is possible with some searching, but then you pay a premium for it. If it's at an auction, it seems like everyone else realizes that it's special too, so any hope of grabbing it for a decent price is lost. I still see more ECs available than Asschers, and they are not as popular as RBs. So maybe you don't have to fight off so many other bidders? That's how I started wondering about the re-cut option.

If $ were no object, there are a few stones that I would love to buy-- among them the traditional Asscher that GOG has right now (I believe it was Kenny's?). It's stunning. Unfortunately, the lottery has not favored me just yet. So, I am trying to find a way to make my dreams come true with some research and resourcefulness.

I was recently following a lovely 8.5 x 9.5 Asscher/Emerald (GIA: Table 59%, Depth 69.5 %, large culet) at an auction. The price went too high and that was it for me (much to DH's relief-- although I think he was a bit sad for me when he saw how disappointed I looked).

Last question: I stumbled across an Asscher with the following information (GIA: 3.92 ct., 9.9 x 9.3 x 4.59, Table 65%, Depth 46.2%).This was set in a very high-end Tiffany piece and I had to read the numbers twice to be sure that I was seeing them correctly. Is this not the opposite of what we are told will make a beautiful Asscher with correct depth and "hall of mirrors" effect?

Thanks in advance for your input!
 
KENNY'S ASSCHER IS FOR SALE???????
 
EC to Asscher is generally not practical.
It would have to be treated as rough and 40% recovery would not be unusual.
At best 60% or so.

The only way to know for sure if an Asscher is a candidate for a re-cut is a full 3d scan by sarinHD tuned for step cuts or a helium scan then put in the hands of a master step cut cutter.
I would guesstimate that 90% of the Asschers on the market are not good candidates for a re-cut.
It would not be cheap even if it was nor very practical.
That said Yoram who cuts my Octavia would be the one to have it do it.
He works with more than one PS vendor who can use his services.
 
decodelighted|1353019054|3307494 said:
KENNY'S ASSCHER IS FOR SALE???????

If $ were no object, there are a few stones that I would love to buy-- among them the traditional Asscher that GOG has right now (I believe it was Kenny's?). It's stunning. Unfortunately, the lottery has not favored me just yet.


It doesn't sound like it. I think she meant that Kenny's stone would be one that she buy if she won the lottery if that stone were available.
 
orbaya|1353020279|3307507 said:
decodelighted|1353019054|3307494 said:
KENNY'S ASSCHER IS FOR SALE???????

If $ were no object, there are a few stones that I would love to buy-- among them the traditional Asscher that GOG has right now (I believe it was Kenny's?). It's stunning. Unfortunately, the lottery has not favored me just yet.

It doesn't sound like it. I think she meant that Kenny's stone would be one that she buy if she won the lottery if that stone were available.
I went to look and ... I think it is the famous 2.26 F VVS1. All same verbage from GOG as w/original sale & stats etc. I remember Isaku's original search that turned up this stone *very well*. Maybe it's a stealth sale - but not anymore?
 
decodelighted|1353021498|3307516 said:
orbaya|1353020279|3307507 said:
decodelighted|1353019054|3307494 said:
KENNY'S ASSCHER IS FOR SALE???????

If $ were no object, there are a few stones that I would love to buy-- among them the traditional Asscher that GOG has right now (I believe it was Kenny's?). It's stunning. Unfortunately, the lottery has not favored me just yet.

It doesn't sound like it. I think she meant that Kenny's stone would be one that she buy if she won the lottery if that stone were available.
I went to look and ... I think it is the famous 2.26 F VVS1. All same verbage from GOG as w/original sale & stats etc. I remember Isaku's original search that turned up this stone *very well*. Maybe it's a stealth sale - but not anymore?
Yes its Kenny's Asscher. Wish I could buy it.
 
A lot of us would buy that asscher if Kenny would sell it to us for what he paid. ;))
 
diamondseeker2006|1353029153|3307622 said:
A lot of us would buy that asscher if Kenny would sell it to us for what he paid. ;))
I was thinking the same thing!
 
Yep it's his. I've started shopping for an upgrade of my 1.54 asscher but that asscher is crazy expensive for the size. I think I'm going to go antique/vintage, prices are still so much better on that side of the market but looking for an antique step cut is like looking for a needle in a haystack.
 
Karl_K|1353020022|3307505 said:
EC to Asscher is generally not practical.
It would have to be treated as rough and 40% recovery would not be unusual.
At best 60% or so.

The only way to know for sure if an Asscher is a candidate for a re-cut is a full 3d scan by sarinHD tuned for step cuts or a helium scan then put in the hands of a master step cut cutter.
I would guesstimate that 90% of the Asschers on the market are not good candidates for a re-cut.
It would not be cheap even if it was nor very practical.
That said Yoram who cuts my Octavia would be the one to have it do it.
He works with more than one PS vendor who can use his services.



Hi,

Thanks for your information. What about leaving the EC in an elongated shape and giving it a more Asscher-like appearance with pronounced windmills? Like the Krupp/Liz Taylor diamond? Would cutting a culet (if there was sufficient depth) help create that appearance? I'll try to post a photo of the vintage one at auction that I loved.

What do you make of the last example I gave where the table is huge and the depth so little? The diamond that was set in the Tiffany piece? Is this not backwards and would result in a "glassy" appearance? Or is this again a matter of not judging a fancy diamond by the numbers but rather by appearance?

In terms of just re-cutting an EC for better light return-- is that really doable in the same way it is for an RB?

Lastly, I am fairly certain that GOG Asscher was Kenny's, but I don't know for sure.
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/9216/

Thank you!
 
Karl_K|1353025276|3307553 said:
decodelighted|1353021498|3307516 said:
orbaya|1353020279|3307507 said:
decodelighted|1353019054|3307494 said:
KENNY'S ASSCHER IS FOR SALE???????

If $ were no object, there are a few stones that I would love to buy-- among them the traditional Asscher that GOG has right now (I believe it was Kenny's?). It's stunning. Unfortunately, the lottery has not favored me just yet.

It doesn't sound like it. I think she meant that Kenny's stone would be one that she buy if she won the lottery if that stone were available.
I went to look and ... I think it is the famous 2.26 F VVS1. All same verbage from GOG as w/original sale & stats etc. I remember Isaku's original search that turned up this stone *very well*. Maybe it's a stealth sale - but not anymore?
Yes its Kenny's Asscher. Wish I could buy it.

Me too. But strangely enough, the desire to buy it wasn't the very first thing that popped up in my head. My instantaneous thought was, "I want to see what colored diamond he gets with those funds!" :cheeky:
 
caligirlatheart|1353057334|3307738 said:
Hi,

Thanks for your information. What about leaving the EC in an elongated shape and giving it a more Asscher-like appearance with pronounced windmills? Like the Krupp/Liz Taylor diamond? Would cutting a culet (if there was sufficient depth) help create that appearance? I'll try to post a photo of the vintage one at auction that I loved.

Same as with an EC a lot are not

What do you make of the last example I gave where the table is huge and the depth so little? The diamond that was set in the Tiffany piece? Is this not backwards and would result in a "glassy" appearance? Or is this again a matter of not judging a fancy diamond by the numbers but rather by appearance?

I suspect its a typo but anything is possible.

In terms of just re-cutting an EC for better light return-- is that really doable in the same way it is for an RB?

not as often, same answer as Asscher. Facet placement is just as important as angle and often you cant get the right placement.

Lastly, I am fairly certain that GOG Asscher was Kenny's, but I don't know for sure.
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/9216/

It is

Thank you!
 
justginger|1353064578|3307755 said:
Karl_K|1353025276|3307553 said:
decodelighted|1353021498|3307516 said:
orbaya|1353020279|3307507 said:
decodelighted|1353019054|3307494 said:
KENNY'S ASSCHER IS FOR SALE???????

If $ were no object, there are a few stones that I would love to buy-- among them the traditional Asscher that GOG has right now (I believe it was Kenny's?). It's stunning. Unfortunately, the lottery has not favored me just yet.

It doesn't sound like it. I think she meant that Kenny's stone would be one that she buy if she won the lottery if that stone were available.
I went to look and ... I think it is the famous 2.26 F VVS1. All same verbage from GOG as w/original sale & stats etc. I remember Isaku's original search that turned up this stone *very well*. Maybe it's a stealth sale - but not anymore?
Yes its Kenny's Asscher. Wish I could buy it.

Me too. But strangely enough, the desire to buy it wasn't the very first thing that popped up in my head. My instantaneous thought was, "I want to see what colored diamond he gets with those funds!" :cheeky:

I think he plans to get the big Octavia... http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/9084/ :love:
 
Karl_K|1353078628|3307870 said:
caligirlatheart|1353057334|3307738 said:
Hi,

Thanks for your information. What about leaving the EC in an elongated shape and giving it a more Asscher-like appearance with pronounced windmills? Like the Krupp/Liz Taylor diamond? Would cutting a culet (if there was sufficient depth) help create that appearance? I'll try to post a photo of the vintage one at auction that I loved.

Same as with an EC a lot are not

What do you make of the last example I gave where the table is huge and the depth so little? The diamond that was set in the Tiffany piece? Is this not backwards and would result in a "glassy" appearance? Or is this again a matter of not judging a fancy diamond by the numbers but rather by appearance?

I suspect its a typo but anything is possible.

In terms of just re-cutting an EC for better light return-- is that really doable in the same way it is for an RB?

not as often, same answer as Asscher. Facet placement is just as important as angle and often you cant get the right placement.

Lastly, I am fairly certain that GOG Asscher was Kenny's, but I don't know for sure.
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/9216/

It is

Thank you!



Hi Karl,

Thank you for your information!

Got a question about an EC that I have recently found: 2.70 ct., 9.40 x 7.38 x 4.54 mm, table 72%, depth 61%, crown height 18%.

By numbers alone should one just dismiss this diamond due to the shallow depth? Or is that an incorrect conclusion? I understand that numbers alone cannot be used with fancies, but I want to know how to decide if I am even in the right ballpark.

I remember reading something about 3 types of EC cutting styles and I believe you mentioned that there are some stones with larger tables than depth that can be quite pretty.

Is a decent crown height % going to make the difference in a stone like this?

For all those SE/Asscher lovers out there, I'm posting a ring with a 4.08 ct. (H, VVS2, table 59%, depth 75.2%) that just came out in the recent Skinner Catalogue:
https://secure.skinnerinc.com/asp/fullCatalogue.asp?salelot=2624B++++791+&refno=80016955

The stone seems to be set side wise (?), but I would be willing to give it a home and fix that.................now if I could only convince DH to re-mortgage the house.... :naughty:

Thanks again!
 
Karl_K|1353189298|3308927 said:
caligirlatheart|1353143709|3308569 said:
For all those SE/Asscher lovers out there, I'm posting a ring with a 4.08 ct. (H, VVS2, table 59%, depth 75.2%) that just came out in the recent Skinner Catalogue:
https://secure.skinnerinc.com/asp/fullCatalogue.asp?salelot=2624B++++791+&refno=80016955
Its a square step cut not an asscher/SE and a rather badly cut one at that.


Hi,

I understand that it's not an Asscher cut, but I'm confused about why it's not a square emerald? It's not very sparkly but aren't the numbers promising, depth of 75.2% and table of 59%? This is kind of what I mean about which numbers mean you are in the ballpark or not? I have read the PS guidelines about Asscher and ECs but I keep seeing stones that I admire that seem to confound the numbers. For example, Mimi's Leon Mege ring with EC and French cuts. The depth and table numbers on that stone are nearly the exact same. Really confused here!!
 
Karl_K|1353189298|3308927 said:
caligirlatheart|1353143709|3308569 said:
For all those SE/Asscher lovers out there, I'm posting a ring with a 4.08 ct. (H, VVS2, table 59%, depth 75.2%) that just came out in the recent Skinner Catalogue:
https://secure.skinnerinc.com/asp/fullCatalogue.asp?salelot=2624B++++791+&refno=80016955
Its a square step cut not an asscher/SE and a rather badly cut one at that.


Hi,

Here's another example below. Do these depth and table numbers mean absolutely that this stone is a dog? Thanks for your help!

EMERALD CUT

Measurements: 10.70 x 8.31 x 4.90 mm
Carat Weight: 3.74 carat
Color Grade: G
Clarity Grade: VS1
PROPORTIONS

Depth: 59.0%
Table: 74%
Girdle: Slightly Thick to Thick
Culet: None
FINISH

Polish: Good
Symmetry: Good
Fluorescence: Faint
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top