shape
carat
color
clarity

DOWN to 2 Stones Am I overlooking anything?

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

dhk8880

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 13, 2007
Messages
21
e=Stone:
2.31 Carats
AGS Ideal 0 Light Performance 0 Proportion Factors 0
Color H
Clarity VS2
Table 61.1
Depth 56
Crown 34.3
Pavaillion 40,7
HCA rates a 0.9
e=Stone:
2.43 Carats
GIA EX EX EX
Color H
Clarity VS2
Table 61.3
Depth 55
Crown 34.5
Pavaillion 40,8
HCA 1.2



I am buying one of these this weekend. I just need a little support. Ideal Scope are not available. I am leaning towards the 2.31 because it is the new AGS report.

Size wise you think there will be a difference?

Which stone would you choose?

Are AGS reports more accurate? Especially since this one has the Light reutrn?

Because these are well cut stones is there a chance when i get it it can be dud?

Thanks. Please help me choose!
 

Skippy123

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Nov 24, 2006
Messages
24,300
The AGS, but if you get to see both in person I would choose the one that talks to you. You shouldn''t see too much of a difference in size. Yay for you!!!! How exciting!
35.gif
 

chrono

Super_Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 22, 2004
Messages
38,364
I think you have the table and depth reversed: I doubt a stone with 56% depth and 61.1% table will get a AGS0 rating.
9.gif

Sizewise, I doubt you'll see much difference.
As for duds, I recall a vendor saying he's never seen a AGS0 dud.

The 2 are really close; you can pick either one. Without an Idealscope pic, I'd play it safe and pick the AGS stone.
 

aljdewey

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Nov 25, 2002
Messages
9,170
I''d most definitely choose the AGS stone, too. LUSCIOUS numbers, earned the light performance grade, wouldn''t be any appreciable difference size.......

Yep. I''d go with that one....the AGS.
 

Ellen

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
24,433
Date: 7/25/2007 3:26:32 PM
Author: aljdewey
I''d most definitely choose the AGS stone, too. LUSCIOUS numbers, earned the light performance grade, wouldn''t be any appreciable difference size.......

Yep. I''d go with that one....the AGS.
Ditto.
 

dhk8880

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 13, 2007
Messages
21
Thanks for you responses. I will be making my descision tommorow. I will post some pics when i get it in.

I am getting a custom band made kinda like a eternity ring with a mount. About 2.15 total weight.

Hopefully this stone looks good in it.
 

Ellen

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
24,433
Date: 7/25/2007 6:09:17 PM
Author: dhk8880
Thanks for you responses. I will be making my descision tommorow. I will post some pics when i get it in.

I am getting a custom band made kinda like a eternity ring with a mount. About 2.15 total weight.

Hopefully this stone looks good in it.
Sounds blingy and beautiful! I''m sure the stone will look great in it.

We look forward to the pics!
 

kcoursolle

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jan 21, 2006
Messages
10,595
Date: 7/25/2007 3:56:42 PM
Author: Ellen

Date: 7/25/2007 3:26:32 PM
Author: aljdewey
I''d most definitely choose the AGS stone, too. LUSCIOUS numbers, earned the light performance grade, wouldn''t be any appreciable difference size.......

Yep. I''d go with that one....the AGS.
Ditto.
double ditto.

I can''t wait to see the lovely ring when it''s done. You must come back with pictures, your setting sounds divine.
 

dhk8880

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jul 13, 2007
Messages
21
I pulled the trigger just bought the 2.31.

Should be here friday. unfortunatly band wont be completed for a couple weeks.
 

Ellen

Super_Ideal_Rock
Joined
Jan 13, 2006
Messages
24,433
Date: 7/25/2007 7:29:26 PM
Author: dhk8880
I pulled the trigger just bought the 2.31.

Should be here friday. unfortunatly band wont be completed for a couple weeks.
36.gif


I can''t wait to see the completed ring. Please come back and post pics!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top