team pandas
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2011
- Messages
- 13
AprilBaby said:I agree I dismiss them because they are trendy. My age group (50's) no one here wears one. It seems all new engagements have them. Can't wait to see the new trend!
70's-80's- yellow gold
90's - marquise
00's - three stone
10's- halo
Next????
^^ This! Because what goes around comes around. Just like we are seeing a resurgence in the "old fashioned" baby names, and also a new wave of 80's style clothing. In the 80's I shuddered at bell-bottoms. In the 90's we laughed at legwarmers. In the 00's high-waisted pants were ghastly... All of these things have come back or are coming back. Ring designs will do the same thing. Halos are just a reincarnation of an antique style. They just happened to make a come-back during the new era of Facebook and Pinterest... so EVERYONE is seeing them. We used to not have that kind of visual overload of what everyone else was wearing. Now we see every fashion trend, hairstyle and even meal that a single person will choose on any given day. I wonder if this saturation will cause the "fads" to come and go faster?? It will be interesting to see how social media effects this cycle over the long haul.stci|1351040003|3291125 said:Antique settings and old diamonds IMO.
lknvrb4|1351068530|3291274 said:I only like a delicate halo that is done right. I don't like halos on larger diamonds because I think they look like space ships. I do like a halo with a colored stone because you can focus on the center stone.
I completely agree.HopeDream|1350884794|3290034 said:Halos are just so trendy right now that I tend to dismiss them a bit just because it's a trend.
I love a well-crafted halo that really frames a stone nicely, but most of the halos I see on the train are generic and blocky-looking maul settings with matching wedding bands. "How many diamonds can I get on this ring for under 2k?"
They look really over-done for what they are - eg. 2ct tw, but the largest stone present is .45 ct. Some are even those illusion multi-stone settings (Not to my personal taste).
It's like they only have a halo ring to keep up with the Joneses, and not for the way it looks.
If I saw a realy nice halo it would probably turn my head, but so far....nada.
Dreamer_D|1350870643|3289965 said:I am no help with settings because I could never get it right either. But I DO think when you are so stumped on a setting sometimes it means you are stuggling with some other aspect of your ring. Like, a struggle between a desire for a larger diamond than you have and social norms. Or a struggle between wanting flash and being uncomfortable with attention. Or a struggle with how much money was spent, but wanting it anyways. Or something else, those are just some things I have dealt with myself or had friends struggle with.
MadisonReese|1351054973|3291246 said:I do! I think halos are a cheaper way to make stones look bigger. People often comment on people's halo rings as being "huge". They make classy 2 ct rings look like 5 ct rings for 1/20th of the price! People that know nothing about jewelry think it's a flashy/expensive ring when it's really a trick of the eye. I think they are trendy. A trend that hopefully dies out.
missy|1351069203|3291276 said:lknvrb4|1351068530|3291274 said:I only like a delicate halo that is done right. I don't like halos on larger diamonds because I think they look like space ships. I do like a halo with a colored stone because you can focus on the center stone.
I agree. A delicate halo done with the correct proportions can be absolutely breathtaking. But a halo can also go horribly wrong if not done properly. It all comes down to personal taste though!