I would like a fact check on the bolded portion, but otherwise I agree wholeheartedly with the rest of the post.I agree with distracts who wrote, "I don't know that "quality" is the right term. Color is overall a preference."
I consider supply and demand.
Whatever is in high demand, and/or low supply, will cost more.
In my mind that doesn't always pencil out to be directly proportional to "quality".
In white diamonds D flawless is the most expensive, that doesn't make it higher quality.
You are not required to prefer what a majority prefers.
People vary.
If you like sapphires with hue, tone, or saturation that is not on the peak of the bell curve of demand, just go for it.
The majority of the world has black hair and speaks a Chinese language, that doesn't make that hairy color or languages higher quality.
More white cars are sold than any other color; that has nothing to do with the quality of cars.
I would like a fact check on the bolded portion, but otherwise I agree wholeheartedly with the rest of the post.
I would like a fact check on the bolded portion, but otherwise I agree wholeheartedly with the rest of the post.
I agree the careless error in no way alters your argument, which I agree with. It just seemed not right that you had said "the majority of the world", which technically to me means at least half of the world's 7 billion population, or more than 3.5 billion people. I'm surprised there's not more English speakers, and almost all those who speak Mandarin are native speakers, not Chinese as a second language. If the majority of the world did speak Chinese, whether Mandarin or Cantonese, that would be a bold turning point for Chinese soft power and influence.