Do these reports match?

[Themasterpiece1]

This stone has 2 AGS reports. The last report made for it was due to AGS adding an inscription to it. Both reports were made by AGS but they give slightly different information.

In the first report the Polish and Symmetry are Ideal. While on the second report the Polish and Symmetry are Excellent. What could cause this difference? Also I see that one report had the light performance established while the other doesn't. Should I be wary of this, or is this normal?

Report 1
http://i.imgur.com/1qwgh8L.png

Report 2
http://i.imgur.com/d36uAv9.jpg

 

[tyty333]

Reports not coming up...

 

[Themasterpiece1]

The reports are on imgur. How can I link them?

 

[Themasterpiece1]

Report 1



Report 2

 

[solgen]

According to the AGS site "The Diamond Quality® Report provides an option for diamonds that have less-than-Ideal grades on cut, polish or symmetry, and, therefore, shows a maximum grade of AGS 1 (Excellent). " So it can't score IDEAL for whatever reason. I believe for the cut to be AGS Ideal 0 it needs the sym and polish also need to be rated as Ideal 0.

I'm not sure why the latter one was done except for the fact that maybe it was sold and they needed to verify the condition so they opted for the cheaper Diamond quality report.