shape
carat
color
clarity

Diamond Software / LGF Effects & Hearts Images

sledge

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Apr 23, 2018
Messages
5,863
Hey @Karl_K I was reading/studying a much older PS thread last night and came across these images you shared under your @strmrdr name of yesteryear before going trade.

Anyhow the jist of the conversation was about clefts in hearts images and how those visual elements are driven by longer LGF. More than that various LGF’s are needed to help balance out different CA/PA combos. As your examples noted 34.5/40.75 vs 35.5/40.5where longer LGF’s help better balance the stone.

Anyhow all that said, the images you provided also showed the light return performance in a numerical output. On the 34.5/40.75 you noted 75 LGF’s were near identical to 83 LGF’s. What wasn’t mentioned was 76-78 and 86 LGF’s show the best light performance.

We see somewhat similar effects in the 35.5/40.5 combo but really 85-86 are the distinct winners by the output metrics.

Obviously there are various preferences associated with shorter or longer LGF’s — broader flashes vs pinfire flashes. Also hearts images will look different as longer LGF’s will have more visible clefts and larger gaps between the tips of hearts and V’s below it.

My question being — what software was/is being used to get the light return stereo outputs? And how do I get my hands on a copy? It’s very interesting to me to see how those numerical values equate to videos I see from various vendors.


IMG_2561.gif

IMG_2562.gif

IMG_2563.gif
 
Hi Sledge,
The software is diamcalc.
Unfortunatly it is no longer being sold.
 
Thank you @Karl_K.

By chance is there any “new” software that provides a similar numerical output? And then to create a 3D stone that you can put in various light environments to see the behavior changes of those changes? Obviously there is ability to spit out a computer generated ASET, IS and H&A image.

With GIA averaging & rounding I have to make more & more assumptions when I see different behaviors in vendor videos — usually not worth discussing as it’s more my curiosity. But it’s incredibly difficult and time consuming to find actual real models to compare and self teach/learn how nuances change/influence some of the small differences I can see.

Guess I’m hungry and want better tools, lol.
 
Unfortunately, I do not know of a replacement for DC.
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top