I''m a bit confused about this. Let''s say you select your diamond criteria and it''s on a level playing field for a "GIA" certified diamond. This is for a round brilliant.
Meaning you run your comparison where all things are the same...carat weight, color, clarity, cut, polish, symmetry, girdle thickness. Table and depth are within ideal proportions.
http://diamonds.pricescope.com/round.asp
How come I''m noticing that some, more expensive diamonds don''t perform as well on the "Holloway Cut Adviser" v.s. "cheaper ones" that DO. Keep in mind I compared these diamonds on the same website.
Am I missing something here? Has anyone else noticed this?
Meaning you run your comparison where all things are the same...carat weight, color, clarity, cut, polish, symmetry, girdle thickness. Table and depth are within ideal proportions.
http://diamonds.pricescope.com/round.asp
How come I''m noticing that some, more expensive diamonds don''t perform as well on the "Holloway Cut Adviser" v.s. "cheaper ones" that DO. Keep in mind I compared these diamonds on the same website.
Am I missing something here? Has anyone else noticed this?