Diamond on hold - Please help me assess

[toteymuss]

Fellow PriceScopers,

I have the following diamond on hold from James Allen and would appreciate a second opinion from your kind selves. Would anybody be willing to interpret the idealscope for me please? My only concern is the small inclusion on the table but I'm assured it's eye clean.

Video of the diamond

 

[miraj]

My pretty-inexperienced opinion:

0.6 HSA. It falls outside the AGS 0 range, but inside GIA Excellent range. 1A total AGA/NAGA (Pavilion Depth 1B).

Nice-looking Idealscope to my eyes - rich red where there is supposed to be red; white where there is supposed to be white; and not a lot of pink. I suspect slight painting based on girdle triangles being slightly long, but not enough to affect performance. Symmetry looks totally fine.

I think inclusion is not visible based on the video. No inclusion plot in the report. I have read mixed opinions on twinning wisps, so you'll have to see in person if it causes any issues.

 

[toteymuss]

My pretty-inexperienced opinion:

0.6 HSA. It falls outside the AGS 0 range, but inside GIA Excellent range. 1A total AGA/NAGA (Pavilion Depth 1B).

Nice-looking Idealscope to my eyes - rich red where there is supposed to be red; white where there is supposed to be white; and not a lot of pink. I suspect slight painting based on girdle triangles being slightly long, but not enough to affect performance. Symmetry looks totally fine.

I think inclusion is not visible based on the video. No inclusion plot in the report. I have read mixed opinions on twinning wisps, so you'll have to see in person if it causes any issues.

Many thanks miraj, appreciate you taking the time to give your thoughts. Anyone else?

 

[tyty333]

The idealscope looks good to me. The H&As are a little off but then again you are not paying for
an H&A (or the stone could be tilted in the images).

 

[bmfang]

IS looks good to me as well. Only thing close to an inclusion I can notice is out on the girdle at around the 9 o'clock mark in diamond image (10 o'clock in the IS). But it's a minor thing. People don't generally tend to look out around the girdle when looking at diamonds so this one looks good.