Hello all! I would really appreciate your opinions and any advice you may have re: my recent purchase.
I received my new ring yesterday and have noticed that the diamond doesn't appear to be as crisp and sharp as my previous diamond. The best way that I can describe its appearance is to call it slightly hazy and cloudy. This cloudiness is most apparent in direct sunlight, but I do notice it in most other lighting conditions as well. The diamond is a WF ES 1.207 H SI1 (totally eye clean from all angles) with 'negligible' fluorescence. For reference, my previous diamond was a WF ACA 0.72 F SI1.
I don't believe this to be a cleaning issue, as I noticed the haziness immediately upon opening the box and have cleaned the diamond multiple times since then. Am I just seeing the difference between an ACA and an ES, despite the fact that both diamonds are graded AGS 0? Perhaps this diamond just has a different personality?
I have attached the pictures that WF sent me after my ring had shipped. I did notice the haziness in these pictures, but had attributed it to the lighting and photography. Am I being too picky?
I received my new ring yesterday and have noticed that the diamond doesn't appear to be as crisp and sharp as my previous diamond. The best way that I can describe its appearance is to call it slightly hazy and cloudy. This cloudiness is most apparent in direct sunlight, but I do notice it in most other lighting conditions as well. The diamond is a WF ES 1.207 H SI1 (totally eye clean from all angles) with 'negligible' fluorescence. For reference, my previous diamond was a WF ACA 0.72 F SI1.
I don't believe this to be a cleaning issue, as I noticed the haziness immediately upon opening the box and have cleaned the diamond multiple times since then. Am I just seeing the difference between an ACA and an ES, despite the fact that both diamonds are graded AGS 0? Perhaps this diamond just has a different personality?
I have attached the pictures that WF sent me after my ring had shipped. I did notice the haziness in these pictures, but had attributed it to the lighting and photography. Am I being too picky?