- Joined
- Jul 23, 2012
- Messages
- 20,250
JulieN|1371330214|3466598 said:The F is nicer than the other three, IMO.
I feel like you will be better served by an ideal cut princess that GOG gives a lifetime guarantee to. No trade-in policy for stones with limited guarantees. The F is not any bigger than many ideal cut .7 ct princess, and the princess will look better.
Niel|1371330459|3466602 said:you arent a bother at all!! radiants just arent as easy as other cuts.![]()
I tend to agree she wants square i say go with an easier square to pick, like a princess or asscher. I tend to think asscher just because they would match your setting, but a princess would be easiest.
JulieN|1371331046|3466607 said:I would ask GOG to make inquiries into this stone, if it is a square "hearts and arrows" style radiant: http://www.b2cjewels.com/dd-2879017-0.73-carat-Radiant-diamond-F-color-VS1-Clarity.aspx?sku=2879017&utm_source=pricescope.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=pricescope.com
Niel|1371331334|3466611 said:i know its on the higher end but would this fall into your budget??
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/10156/
tblanke|1371336635|3466659 said:Niel|1371331334|3466611 said:i know its on the higher end but would this fall into your budget??
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/10156/
That diamond would bring me to the high end of my budget, but if you think this would be a better value I am open to suggestions. If you could justify the additional $600 to upgrade to this radiant over the .8 F I am willing to consider it.
I see it is classified as a Princess of Hearts (not 100% sure what that means) and has the lifetime guarantee. But it also looks like it has a 1.15 (rectangular) ratio. Which kind of puts me back to where I started on the first batch lol.
Thanks again for all your help Niel!
And to all of the Fathers out there have a Happy Fathers Day weekend!!
*Edit*: Not 100% sure about the l/w ratio on the one you linked the report says 1.0 ratio (5.15/5.14), but on the scroll down side it says 5.16/5.99..so I don't know. If it the report is accurate I think it would be very hard to pass this one up.
JulieN|1371342525|3466708 said:http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/10036/
In budget. No sharp corners. Very square sides, basically as square as possible and still be a cushion. Modern (not vintage/antique) style. Lifetime guarantee.
tblanke|1371395804|3466880 said:JulieN|1371342525|3466708 said:http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/10036/
In budget. No sharp corners. Very square sides, basically as square as possible and still be a cushion. Modern (not vintage/antique) style. Lifetime guarantee.
Wow that looks like an amazing stone for the money! After spending hours reading about the different types of cushions vs radiant's and gia vs ags and this vs that and spending the night sleeping on it, it seems like I may never find the right diamond :/ ... The price is fantastic and is the only diamond I've seen that has come in under budget! After reading the GOG loose diamond policy, finding one that comes with their lifetime guarantee instead of the limited policy looks like a huge plus. I never realized a cushion could be so square! And I absolutely love the hearts and arrows and can see why the last 3 diamonds you and Niel suggested fall under that category. And lastly it looks like you almost get the same "face up" (I think) size in this .68 cushion as in the .8 radiant almost a 5x5 mm, which is exactly what I was looking for!
Niel|1371342883|3466711 said:tblanke|1371336635|3466659 said:[quote="Niel|1371
I saw that ratio, but it looks square which is why I suggested it. If ask them the actual ratio just to make sure. Those are going to perform a lot better than the classic radiants youre looking at. I think if you have it in the budget its worth considering. I think you'd be surprise in the difference if you got them to make a comparison video.
Niel|1371398275|3466897 said:IMHO I think that cushion is the best option. It'll look more appropriate in that vintage setting than a sharp corner radiant. It hits that 5mm mark. Also its cheap. Plus, it will perform better than the radiant you picked. I don't think you necessarily need a video if they charge you more, but at least a pic to make sure its eye clean and you like it.