There may be some, but few, who would buy an H VS1 over F VS2 or G SI1.
If you''re going for value, the 1.5 G, definitely... but if you''d miss that $1K in your wallet, then the F is good, too (but in that case, you should probably just get a smaller H SI1 to save your money.) So, my final answer is the G.
haha, I like your thread title, funny! Well, if you want big the last 2 look nice; all of them look nice. I would find out if the last 2 are eye clean; what is the difference in price between the last 2?
If budget isn''t a huge issue I would take the G Si1. No point in paying for clarity you can''t see like with the last one. I''d rather have a bump in color.
And the first one would be beautiful too, but the color difference really won''t be noticeable and I''d rather have a bump in size that is pretty significant for only $1000 more!
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/4941/
LOL! These are both top cut stones, you can't go wrong with either assuming they are eyeclean - I take it you have checked that? It comes down to your individual preference etc to choose between them, budget etc.
Ditto above. Probably you might want to take a look at which vendor has the setting you like and go with their stones if they come back all eye-clean and still a tie.
Thanks to everyone for weighing in, and thanks to Pricescope for such a wonderful website. After a a medium dosage of hemming and hawing, I went with #2:
1.5 G SI1
ACA, H&A
Chris and Lesley at Whiteflash were super patient and more than accomodating when it came to working with a diamond buffoon like me. If I had the extra digit, I''d give them 3 thumbs up.
I''m expecting receipt of the stone tomorrow and then it''s off to plunk it into a MB Petite Princess.