shape
carat
color
clarity

Diamond A, B, or C

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.

EasternShore25

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
6
I am new so bear with me....but based on the specs alone, which one would you choose and why?

Also I plan to put this in a platinum setting with side baguettes, not sure if that matters...

Diamond A

Price: $11,980
Shape: Round
Laboratory: AGS
Carat Weight: 1.80
Cut: Ideal
Color: G
Clarity: SI1
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Fluorescence: None
Dimensions: 7.75-7.78x4.87
Depth %: 62.80
Table %: 57.00
Culet: None
Girdle:Thin-Medium

Diamond B

Price: $11,972
Shape: Round
Certificate: GIA
Carat Weight: 1.87
Cut Grade: Ideal/Excellent
Color: G
Clarity: SI1
Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Fluorescence: M
Measurements: 7.84-7.90-4.86
Depth %: 61.8
Table %: 58
Culet: None
Girdle: -

Diamond C

Price:$12,770
Shape: Round
Laboratory: GIA
Carat Weight: 1.91
Cut: Ideal
Color: F
Clarity: SI1
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Very Good
Fluorescence: None
Dimensions: 7.78-7.86x4.98
Depth %: 63.70
Table %: 56.00
Culet: None
Girdle: Slightly Thick-Thick
 
Hi EasternShore, welcome to PS.

At the very least, we need crown and pavillion angles to make an informed judgement of a diamond--star and lgf% are also helpful. Of course, photos and Idealscope images would be the best, but if you want to make a purchase decision based on just the numbers, the angles are a must.

Now the numbers you posted can raise some red flags. The last diamond's depth is much too high, are we sure the 63.7 is correct? GIA doesn't issue an Ideal cut grade, so that is a vendor's description--the diamond could get no better than VG from GIA with that girdle. The first is a little deep as well, but could be OK depending on other factors.
 
Diamond A & C are a bit too deep. You can tell already with stone C being 1.91ct but the size is smaller than stone B with 1.87ct. Otherwise, ditto jet2ks, we need the crown and pavillion angles to determine the cut.
 
Date: 1/5/2010 4:32:44 PM
Author: EasternShore25
Thanks for the hlep, however, I am looking at these online and the above specs are all that are listed.

They make no mention of angles, etc in the listings.

I was able to find the following link to the GIA report for Diamond C:

http://www.questjewelers.com/cert.php?cert=34203414&c=GIA&stock=3Q34203414
Yep, pass on that one. The angles are not a very good compliment for each other and most likely will not reflect light in the best way. If you have the AGS & GIA report number for the first two, we can look up the full specs.
 

Man you guys are good!


Diamond A is 9Q48517496


Still working on Diamond B

 
Based on just the information listed I''d be skeptical about all three. Is it possible to get some additional options and/or look at other vendors?

Also, vendors who won''t provide reports right off the bat/immediately upon request are always a bit sketchy to me - you shouldn''t have to be tracking these down yourself...
 
Date: 1/5/2010 4:39:23 PM
Author: jet2ks
Date: 1/5/2010 4:32:44 PM

Author: EasternShore25

Thanks for the hlep, however, I am looking at these online and the above specs are all that are listed.

They make no mention of angles, etc in the listings.

I was able to find the following link to the GIA report for Diamond C:

http://www.questjewelers.com/cert.php?cert=34203414&c=GIA&stock=3Q34203414
Yep, pass on that one. The angles are not a very good compliment for each other and most likely will not reflect light in the best way. If you have the AGS & GIA report number for the first two, we can look up the full specs.

Ditto
 
Date: 1/5/2010 4:39:23 PM
Author: jet2ks

Date: 1/5/2010 4:32:44 PM
Author: EasternShore25
Thanks for the hlep, however, I am looking at these online and the above specs are all that are listed.

They make no mention of angles, etc in the listings.

I was able to find the following link to the GIA report for Diamond C:

http://www.questjewelers.com/cert.php?cert=34203414&c=GIA&stock=3Q34203414
This one is a steep deep with the crown and pavilion angles, I would pass on this one personally and it is too deep physically, out of these the second has the most potential but again the angles are needed.
 
Date: 1/5/2010 6:40:16 PM
Author: AmberGretchen
Based on just the information listed I''d be skeptical about all three. Is it possible to get some additional options and/or look at other vendors?

Also, vendors who won''t provide reports right off the bat/immediately upon request are always a bit sketchy to me - you shouldn''t have to be tracking these down yourself...
I agree.
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top