pricescope
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 31, 1999
- Messages
- 8,266
Date: 3/23/2007 8:35:10 PM
Author: Shay37
In a side note, INSURANCE anyone?
ITa - she acted as though tiffany diamonds are supposed to be harder or something LOL That "chip" is more like a giant cleave! And it seems to be under the half bezel... what''s up with that? I don''t think tiffany is responsible for this at all, didn''t they tell her to get insurance? LOL I''m surprised tiffany doesn''t offer Tiffany Brand tm insurance LOLDate: 3/23/2007 9:34:45 PM
Author: RockDoc
Hi Neil
You made a nice presentation, but knowing how these things go with TV, I will bet a dollar to a donut, that they taped you for hours, and only presented a very small fraction of what you did.
The ''L'' shape break has me curious. Sounds like maybe some internal graining originally? Where you able to come up with a cause for this? For a girdle to chip in two spots, I think is rather uncommon too, Did it have a thin girdle or shallow crown.
Did she have insurance?
Not to play favorites here, but if you don''t have insurance, and have some damage in wear, I commonly see that consumers want to make the seller held liable. In some instances this may be deserved, but in others, I am not sure exactly how much liability the seller should have, and for how long.
You looked good in the interview.....kudos
Rockdoc
Based on looking at the mounting, the ring was subjected to a fair amount of wear, much of which is visible in the pictures. The mounting is cast 950 platinum. The damage to the stone occurred in at least 2 and possibly 3 separate incidences over the span of several years. The ‘L shaped chip' is a cleave that runs from the edge of the stone diagonally through to the pavilion, roughly parallel to the crown. The piece is completely separated from the bulk of the stone and is being held on by the channel wall. The visible girdle is thin faceted. The stone is roughly a 70 pointer. It was reported to have been a VS1 although the damage is so severe that there really is no way to corroborate that. I think it's entirely plausible.
As was mentioned at the end of the story, most insurance carriers would call this a covered peril under their standard policies. A claim for the first chip would probably have resulted in a complete replacement of the diamond which raises an interesting question about what the damages are for the second and subsequent events. If the stone was already worthless, there would be no monetary damages and insurance wouldn’t be applicable. Chipped diamonds generally have what’s known as salvage value, meaning that the insurance company can sell the damaged stone to a cutter after they’ve completed the claim and this was clearly lost by the latter damage but on a stone this size the salvage value after the original chip would have been a fraction of the value of the total claim. In effect, there was a loss from the big cleave that was the subject of the story but 90% of her monetary loss occurred at the time of the first chip several years before.
That should read 'the edge of the table.Date: 3/24/2007 9:11:58 AM
Author: denverappraiser
The ‘L shaped chip' is a cleave that runs from the edge of the stone diagonally through to the pavilion, roughly parallel to the crown.
okay boys you''re too funny LOL Now I''m seriously afraid for my stone, I think I''ll go back to my original idea of incasing it in metal. It won''t sparkle much there, but it''ll be safe LOLDate: 3/24/2007 2:39:36 PM
Author: denverappraiser
Date: 3/24/2007 1:20:20 PM
Author: JohnQuixote
I don’t mean to question you Neil, but isn’t it possible that the altitude in Seriously though, congrats.It’s nice that the media in Denver knew who to seek for top advice, and convenient that an ICGA just happens to live in the mile high city. Buyers appreciate information on how to care-for & maintain their jewelry over time in general. In an ideal (excellent) world, we would do a better job communicating the importance of good insurance to all clients.Even a flawless diamond can chip if struck on a cleavage plane.![]()
I’m impressed with your technical mumbo jumbo skills. I’m especially impressed with your usage of the technical term for Hooters Airlines but gosh John, why would someone strike you there, you’re a married man?
Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA
Professional Appraisals in Denver
ps. The client is from Aspen at close to double the altitude. I''m sure she counts Denver as the flatlands.
Date: 3/24/2007 8:59:53 PM
Author: Cehrabehra
okay boys you''re too funny LOL Now I''m seriously afraid for my stone, I think I''ll go back to my original idea of incasing it in metal. It won''t sparkle much there, but it''ll be safe LOL
Cehra,
There is a certain breakage risk to owning diamonds, but it’s not really all that high. There’s an instructive lesson to be learned from the insurance companies here. They will assume this risk, along with the risk of theft, fire, loss and a whole litany of other perils for a fee on the order of 2% of the value per year. This would suggest that they expect to pay a claim less than once every 50 years. In practice, this sort of thing is nowhere near the top of the things so people file claims about so if we call it ¼ of the claims we’re talking an expected loss rate for breakage of once every 200 years. It’s actually less than that since they’re extracting some decent profits on this deal and I think 25% of the claims is probably a bit high. It’s also worth noting that they don’t give a discount for bezels or other settings that are seen as more secure. They just don’t see it as making all that much difference.
The moral of the story isn’t that you are especially pushing your luck by owning and wearing diamonds. Set it in something that makes your heart sing, buy an insurance policy backed by a well-documented appraisal, wear and enjoy it, and file a claim in the unlikely case that you need to. That’s what you’re paying them for.
Great story Neil - well doneDate: 3/24/2007 9:38:02 AM
Author: denverappraiser
That should read ''the edge of the table.Date: 3/24/2007 9:11:58 AM
Author: denverappraiser
The ‘L shaped chip'' is a cleave that runs from the edge of the stone diagonally through to the pavilion, roughly parallel to the crown.
Neil Beaty
GG(GA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA
Professional Appraisals in Denver
Date: 3/24/2007 2:39:36 PM
Author: denverappraiser
Date: 3/24/2007 1:20:20 PM
Author: JohnQuixote
I don’t mean to question you Neil, but isn’t it possible that the altitude in Seriously though, congrats.It’s nice that the media in Denver knew who to seek for top advice, and convenient that an ICGA just happens to live in the mile high city. Buyers appreciate information on how to care-for & maintain their jewelry over time in general. In an ideal (excellent) world, we would do a better job communicating the importance of good insurance to all clients.Even a flawless diamond can chip if struck on a cleavage plane.![]()
I’m impressed with your technical mumbo jumbo skills. I’m especially impressed with your usage of the technical term for Hooters Airlines but gosh John, why would someone strike you there, you’re a married man?
Neil Beaty
GG(GIA) ICGA(AGS) NAJA
Professional Appraisals in Denver
ps. The client is from Aspen at close to double the altitude. I'm sure she counts Denver as the flatlands.
As I wrote Roc, the stone was having its corners polished off. As you can see the others had already been done.Date: 3/25/2007 12:45:22 AM
Author: RockDoc
Hi Garry
Was there strain in the stone before the ''event''?
What was the event? Heat and vibration ? or an impact?
Do you have a side view with polarized filters? Top view doesn''t really show the angle of the grain direction.
Laser sawing does make the stones very brittle.
HPHT treatment results sometimes in organized strain patterns.
Looks like a fun stone to play with.
Rockdoc
Date: 3/24/2007 11:58:15 PM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
Here is an excellent example of L shaped damage on a princess we were polising the corners off. (We do that with every princess +1/2 ct in order to make them live forever).
Roc I suspect that this diamond may have been laser sawn because of excessive stress. It is one of the reasons why I now have changed my opinion about stress and risk of breakage since I know such stones are streamed to laser sawing and laser bruting in highly mechanised factories so as to reduce the cutters risk of breakage. (it was VS2 btw, before the event)
you can see how the chipping has followed the octahedral planes, and there are flaws now right through the rest of the stone.
I have donated the carcass to science. An article is being written about it for the Australian Gemmologist. Then it will go into the students collection at the GAA.
I had the same thoughts after watching it!! Also, I thnk people in general wear their rings too much and don''t get them cleaned, polished, and inspected very often.Date: 3/23/2007 8:35:10 PM
Author: Shay37
Congrats to Neil.
In a side note, INSURANCE anyone?
And if that wasn''t a hammered setting, it certainly had taken some cough abuse cough.
shay
The VS inclusion near the corner was not the corner that broke Pyramid.Date: 4/9/2007 11:10:38 AM
Author: Pyramid
Date: 3/24/2007 11:58:15 PM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
Here is an excellent example of L shaped damage on a princess we were polising the corners off. (We do that with every princess +1/2 ct in order to make them live forever).
Roc I suspect that this diamond may have been laser sawn because of excessive stress. It is one of the reasons why I now have changed my opinion about stress and risk of breakage since I know such stones are streamed to laser sawing and laser bruting in highly mechanised factories so as to reduce the cutters risk of breakage. (it was VS2 btw, before the event)
you can see how the chipping has followed the octahedral planes, and there are flaws now right through the rest of the stone.
I have donated the carcass to science. An article is being written about it for the Australian Gemmologist. Then it will go into the students collection at the GAA.
Garry H
I meant to ask this at that time I read this thread, but are you also now of the opinion now that different types of inclusions in diamonds can pose a durability risk?
But Pyramid, it died fora good cause, because now you believe me that inclusions and breakage do not go hand in hand.Date: 4/10/2007 6:55:17 AM
Author: Pyramid
Thanks Garry. Yes I had noticed it was the internal stress part you had discussed in regard to laser being used to cut rough but I just wondered if it also meant stress and inclusions. It must be horrible when a nice stone like that gets so much damage![]()