canadianice
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2003
- Messages
- 82
I have found a so-called "Super Ideal" cut diamond that has everything I am looking for in colour , size, clarity... and price.
I studied the Sarin report, and the only criticisms I have are the crown angle variance, 33.9-34.9 degree (1.0 variance, avg. 34.4deg), and table size 55.3-56.2 (0.9% variance, avg 55.7).
All of these angles/percentages fall into the "ideal" range.
All other variances for the stone (crown height, pavilion angle, pavilion height) are 0.2-0.4.
Is this too picky? Is 1.0 deg variance acceptable for the crown angle, to be considered a precisely cut diamond?
FYI, Brilliance Scope readings were VH3+ white; VH3+ colour; VH1 scintillation. H&A looked really crisp and defined.
Thanks for any input...
I studied the Sarin report, and the only criticisms I have are the crown angle variance, 33.9-34.9 degree (1.0 variance, avg. 34.4deg), and table size 55.3-56.2 (0.9% variance, avg 55.7).
All of these angles/percentages fall into the "ideal" range.
All other variances for the stone (crown height, pavilion angle, pavilion height) are 0.2-0.4.
Is this too picky? Is 1.0 deg variance acceptable for the crown angle, to be considered a precisely cut diamond?
FYI, Brilliance Scope readings were VH3+ white; VH3+ colour; VH1 scintillation. H&A looked really crisp and defined.
Thanks for any input...