Cowgirly
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2006
- Messages
- 27
Its all a matter of taste..., me personally, i prefer small tables (from 50% to max 59%)Date: 3/16/2006 1:59:37 AM
Author:Cowgirly
G-VS2, 2.01
7.67x6.80x4.87mm
Table: 71.6%
Depth: 65%
Girdle: Extremely thin to slightly thick, faceted
Culet: none
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Good
Comments: none
Key to symbols
Feather
Cloud
Natural
You know...Cushions are such unique stones. Since you saw the stone, you are at an advantage over us here on PS. If you like what you see, the numbers mean very little. I actually am drawn to more rectangular, bigger tabled cushions and currently have a completely different sort of cushion. For now, its ok but later...Date: 3/16/2006 1:59:37 AM
Author:Cowgirly
G-VS2, 2.01
7.67x6.80x4.87mm
Table: 71.6%
Depth: 65%
Girdle: Extremely thin to slightly thick, faceted
Culet: none
Polish: Very Good
Symmetry: Good
Comments: none
Key to symbols
Feather
Cloud
Natural
Ex. thin is no problem really, it does not mean its a wavy girdle, but this will be proven only with seeing the diamond.Date: 3/16/2006 2:38:11 AM
Author: Cowgirly
Hello,
Thank you for replying to my post. The problem is that I have never seen the stone. I am currently in the bay area and I am working with a jeweler in New York. The only thing I can go by is the numbers. I have been researching on PS and from what I know, the table % is way too large. Also, I am skeptical about the extremely thin to slightly thick girdle. If I am correct, this means the girdle is wavy. The extremely thin portion will not fare well in the future. I know cushions are not that popular and it seems like vendors are having a hard time finding me diamonds to choose from. I am getting antsy!!