Hello all! Long time lurker, first time posting. I have taken a LOT of information in over the past few weeks, but am drawing very close to pulling the trigger on a purchase. I will the proposing to the love of my life soon, but need to nail down the ring first! Months ago she showed me her "dream ring" - of course it turns out to be the Harry Winston Cushion Cut Micropave! Now, how do I know she is the one? She followed it up by saying she would be happy with a cracker jack ring- and means it. (I am a lucky guy!) Still, I'd like to find a happy middle ground and give her something she truly deserves!!
I have looked at everyone from Leon Mege, to Steven Kirsch, to ERD, to you name it. My problem is I there is a very specific look I am seeking, but I am trying to understand what factor changes the amount of "metal" showing through the setting. By way of example, the first image attached is the stock photo of the HW. Notice how clean the image is, with little to no metal showing between the small diamonds. Yet when a non-stock photo (see image 2) you can certainly see metal.
Compare this so the Simon G 1840 ring. In the stock photo (see image 3) you can see plenty of metal, whereas in a non-stock photo (see image 4) there is little to no metal.
What accounts for the difference here? Am I missing something (like you can get larger or smaller diamonds to cover or expose more metal)?
Ultimately, I am trying to get as clean of a look as possible while balancing cost. In my case, I also happen to have a connection with Simon G to get me a great deal. That said, I am not willing to sacrifice too much just in the name of saving a few dollars.
I really appreciate any help!!




I have looked at everyone from Leon Mege, to Steven Kirsch, to ERD, to you name it. My problem is I there is a very specific look I am seeking, but I am trying to understand what factor changes the amount of "metal" showing through the setting. By way of example, the first image attached is the stock photo of the HW. Notice how clean the image is, with little to no metal showing between the small diamonds. Yet when a non-stock photo (see image 2) you can certainly see metal.
Compare this so the Simon G 1840 ring. In the stock photo (see image 3) you can see plenty of metal, whereas in a non-stock photo (see image 4) there is little to no metal.
What accounts for the difference here? Am I missing something (like you can get larger or smaller diamonds to cover or expose more metal)?
Ultimately, I am trying to get as clean of a look as possible while balancing cost. In my case, I also happen to have a connection with Simon G to get me a great deal. That said, I am not willing to sacrifice too much just in the name of saving a few dollars.
I really appreciate any help!!



