Stone A
Report: AGS
. Shape: A Cut Above H&A
. Carat: 1.300
. Depth %: 62.1
. Table %: 55.7
. Crown Angle: 34.9
. Crown %: 15.4
. Star : 52.2
. Pavilion Angle: 40.8
. Pavilion %: 43.1
. Lower Girdle %: 75.3
. Girdle: Thin to Slightly Thick Faceted
. Measurements: 6.95-6.99X4.33
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible
Color H
Clarity VS2
$8169
Stone B
. Report: AGS
. Shape: A Cut Above H&A
. Carat: 1.280
. Depth %: 61.9
. Table %: 55.6
. Crown Angle: 34.8
. Crown %: 15.4
. Star : 52.1
. Pavilion Angle: 40.9
. Pavilion %: 43.3
. Lower Girdle %: 75
. Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted
. Measurements: 6.95-6.97X4.31
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible Color H
Clarity SI1
$7,480
Which one would you choose? I know the stones are very similar, so I guess the question iis: is A worth the additional $700 to get the VS2 instead of SI1. I've been assurred that the SI1 is eye clean and the person at WF called it a "beautiful stone that I'll love." The other thing is should I be concerned about the darkness on the table that shows up on the ideal scope for the image of B? I really want to find the beautiful rock for by GF, and it's come down to these two. I'm leaning towards B so that I can get her a nicer custom setting, but don't know if I should just go with the VS2.
Also, the VS2 has thin to slightly thick girdle which I guess is holding the additional .02 carots. Is this just wasted weight? Any advice is much appreciated! Thanks in advance!!!
Ideal Scope for B

Report: AGS
. Shape: A Cut Above H&A
. Carat: 1.300
. Depth %: 62.1
. Table %: 55.7
. Crown Angle: 34.9
. Crown %: 15.4
. Star : 52.2
. Pavilion Angle: 40.8
. Pavilion %: 43.1
. Lower Girdle %: 75.3
. Girdle: Thin to Slightly Thick Faceted
. Measurements: 6.95-6.99X4.33
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible
Color H
Clarity VS2
$8169
Stone B
. Report: AGS
. Shape: A Cut Above H&A
. Carat: 1.280
. Depth %: 61.9
. Table %: 55.6
. Crown Angle: 34.8
. Crown %: 15.4
. Star : 52.1
. Pavilion Angle: 40.9
. Pavilion %: 43.3
. Lower Girdle %: 75
. Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted
. Measurements: 6.95-6.97X4.31
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible Color H
Clarity SI1
$7,480
Which one would you choose? I know the stones are very similar, so I guess the question iis: is A worth the additional $700 to get the VS2 instead of SI1. I've been assurred that the SI1 is eye clean and the person at WF called it a "beautiful stone that I'll love." The other thing is should I be concerned about the darkness on the table that shows up on the ideal scope for the image of B? I really want to find the beautiful rock for by GF, and it's come down to these two. I'm leaning towards B so that I can get her a nicer custom setting, but don't know if I should just go with the VS2.
Also, the VS2 has thin to slightly thick girdle which I guess is holding the additional .02 carots. Is this just wasted weight? Any advice is much appreciated! Thanks in advance!!!

Ideal Scope for B
