Come check out the bling...without the logos

[fa21212]

let me know your thoughts...both positive and negative

 

[fa21212]

pic 2

 

[fa21212]

pic 3

 

[Lofi]

Ooo... My thoughts?! Think it''s absolutely beautiful... love it.

 

[Autumnovember]

My thoughts are that I want more pictures of that absolutely stunning ring.

Just beautiful. Gorgeous. Amazing.

 

[akmiss]

I love this setting! and I can''t wait to see hand-shots!

 

[fa21212]

Thanks for all the comments guys!

 

[Supers]

Nice... is that the Champagne setting?

 

[missydebby]

so pretty!!!!

 

[chiquitapet]

Absolutely stunning!

 

[lknvrb4]

It''s very pretty, is the band a scattered band? It''s a little hard to tell in the pictures.

 

[DearBuddha]

I love the Champagne setting. It''s such a beautiful ring!

 

[gemgirl]

Champagne bubbles galore! It''s really gorgeous. I like the proportion of the three stones. Can you give us an idea of specs?

 

[tyty333]

Oh my gosh, I think it is lovely!

 

[RaiKai]

Oh, it is a 3-stone Champagne setting! I have only ever seen the single-stone settings, so it is lovely and unique!

 

[holly sparkle]

Oh wow I am so jealous!! Absolutely stunning!!

 

[cushioncutnut]

What great pics! It is gorgeous!!

 

[fa21212]

Thanks for all the comments guys. I just got it and it looks better in real life than it does in the pix. When the future fiance picked this out, I was a little bit skeptical, but ultimately she''s wearing the ring and not me, so she has the final word. In response to your questions, there are diamonds concentrated at the top near the 3 stones which give it some extra sparkle, and then diamonds are scattered in the middle part of the band with no diamonds on the bottom part. If you think about the dynamics of what people can see when you wear a ring, I think it makes sense to have this design. The band is quite petite which is a major plus, I''m not a fan of big bands and it''s probably more comfortable to wear with less obstruction on your other fingers especially given how long you''ll be wearing it.

The center stone is 1.221, Whiteflash ACA, SI1 eye clean. The sidestones are 0.25ct Whiteflash ACA and there is 0.44ct of diamonds scattered on the band which are also Whiteflash ACA. The band is 5.5.

The diamonds perform quite well and are sparkly in a wide variety of lighting conditions including low lighting conditions.

 

[Catmom]

It''s absolutely gorgeous! Can we see some hand shots?

 

[SparkleNut]

This ring is SO BEAUTIFUL! Words just can''t describe how pretty it is. You done terrific!

 

[Zappy]

Diamonds everywhere! I love it! Hand shots please

 

[jill_s]

Wow - it''s really beautiful! I''d love to see some handshots!

 

[Laila619]

Wow, that''s just gorgeous!

 

[SB621]

Love it! I actually really like the 3 stone setting better then the single stone, which is surprizing typically that is not my taste.

Do you know if she will get the matching wedding band? if so that would be gorgeous! Lots O'' Bling!

 

[fa21212]

I didn''t know there was a matching wedding band. Can you please send me a link?

 

[Luckyeshe]

Stunning!!! I can''t wait to see handshots!!!

 

[Tuckins1]

I love it, it''s sparklicious!

 

[nosirrah]

looks great, congratulations! can''t wait to see some handshots

 

[lweber]

This is a beautiful ring. Please post hand shots. Scatter diamonds is a favorite and yours is lovely.

 

[omieluv]

Very pretty! I have the 'Champagne' Pave Band wedding band (in plat), which I wear as a RHR and it sparkles like crazy.