newguy2010
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2010
- Messages
- 7
I remember hearing that they were tougher on colour or clarity ( can''t remember which) but maybe one of the experts with recent knowledge of how the two compare can advise.Date: 3/9/2010 6:45:38 AM
Author: yssie
Experts please correct me if I''m wrong - I believe historically AGS was somewhat harsher, but there were complaints and so they adjusted to be in-line with GIA grading?
agree with QM.my wife''s GIA H is closer to G,her AGS I is closer to J.Date: 3/9/2010 10:44:17 AM
Author: QueenMum
I saw several diamonds that were graded harsher by GIA than by AGS, for the color.
So I think GIA is stricter for the color.
Date: 3/9/2010 11:39:02 AM
Author: Dancing Fire
what i don't understand is...what so hard about matching up the color with a master set.![]()
The "actual" grade would be the result of a coin toss, just as it is now.Date: 3/9/2010 1:42:46 PM
Author: Tom Gelb
Also I would suggest that your idea would not solve the question of an in between grade. If a stone was between 8 and 9 or even 101 and 102 what is the actual grade?
thanks,Tom. good to know that infor.Date: 3/9/2010 1:42:46 PM
Author: Tom Gelb
Just as an FYI at the GIA and I believe most other labs the master stones are placed at the highest end of a color range so if a diamond is better (has less color) than the F masterstone then it would be graded as an E, if it was better than the E masterstone then it would be a D.
I hope this helps.