Choosing between (3) Whiteflash Diamonds

[dyer_maker]

(2) were recommended by another forum member previously, another by Whiteflash. They all seem solid however the largest is a bit questionable to me. Any opinions would be appreciated.

Thanks

http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3449653.htm

http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-2982231.htm

http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3430624.htm

 

[telephone89]

I like the 1.633 & the 1.522. The 1.966 is nice, but WAY more than the others. Id probably go with the 1.633 and squeak out a bit more size over the higher colour/smaller 1.522. You can ask them why it isn't an ACA, but generally it's something quite minor.

 

[Dancing Fire]

I like the 1.633 & the 1.522. The 1.966 is nice, but WAY more than the others. Id probably go with the 1.633 and squeak out a bit more size over the higher colour/smaller 1.522. You can ask them why it isn't an ACA, but generally it's something quite minor.

Me think b/c one of the heart is off "smaller" + maybe a little bit too deep for being a ACA?

 

[tweeter8177]

They all seem like they would be beautiful choices! I would ask them about their definition of "eye clean" and make sure they meet your requirements. It looks like they define it by looking at the diamond from 10 inches away. For example, can you see the inclusions from 6 inches away or from the side view...if that is important to you? It might help eliminate one. By the way, I am a huge fan of SI1 so I would be fine with any of them. You could also see if they would do a video of all of them side by side (or your top 2) and you could see if one speaks to you. The 1.966 is quite a bit bigger than the others and more money so you probably need to decide if you want to spend that much. I personally would take the size if I had a choice.

 

[telephone89]

I like the 1.633 & the 1.522. The 1.966 is nice, but WAY more than the others. Id probably go with the 1.633 and squeak out a bit more size over the higher colour/smaller 1.522. You can ask them why it isn't an ACA, but generally it's something quite minor.

Me think b/c one of the heart is off "smaller" + maybe a little bit too deep for being a ACA?

Yes, I would agree. I think the 1:00 and the 5:00 hears are slightly off, and a touch deep, but nothing that would dissuade me personally

 

[solgen]

I like the patterning of the 1.633. The 1.966 is quite a bit more so there might be better choices at that price point. I don't like the inclusions in it so I'd pass on that one.

 

[dyer_maker]

Thanks for all the feedback. Helped me with the purchase.