Changing from I color to E/F GOG AVC

[CushionNovice]

I''ve decided that my GOG AVC - I VVS2 is too warm for me (I haven''t seen it with my own eyes but I''m nervous)... So before I pull the trigger on getting it set I''m having one last think about changing it (is it just me or is it mental to think about this ALL day??)...

Ok so I wanted some advice from the experts. I''ve looked at the below choices... 2 are in the price range of my current stone, 1 is a little higher and the other alot more. I would like to know peoples thoughts on the stones chosen. Forget money for a minute and just consider the actual stones... If the more expensive one is AMAZING then perhaps i could do it... however it looks like the smaller ones are pretty fabulous and have better ASET and P&S gradings?

Would you change to any of these stones and why? PS. I''m putting this in a halo, and I''m not fussed about L/W ratio.. (i like square and rect)

My current stone is:
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6386/ and I recently listed information on it in an earlier post.


I''m considering changing to any from the below... Ideally I want high color but being a bloody woman I still want some size...

but i''m happy to go down in size for a gorgeous stone... here''s my thoughts before I pull the trigger on the production of the ring:

E SI2 1.05 - Looks great is rectangular but I don''t mind about this. Lovely color. Similar price point to current stone - small but higher in color.
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6906/

G SI1 1.04 - Gorgeous ASET!! Similar price point to above and current stone - is this a better option for the same price?
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6463/

FSI2 1.5 - Jon at GOG has told me its eyeclean. It''s not as spready as many other 1.5ct but everything else looks fabo I think? It''s $4k more than the above choices...
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6706/

And finally I was thinking if I wanted color, spread at an in between price of all of the above.. I considered a 4 main from GOG rather than the AVC??? (Remember I''ve not seen the AVC in person however felll in love ''online'' with it

... but this one looks big and bright and is in between the costs....
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6259/

any thoughts greatly apprieciated

 

[ChunkyCushionLover]

Date: 3/28/2010 11:05:49 PM
Author:CushionNovice
I''ve decided that my GOG AVC - I VVS2 is too warm for me (I haven''t seen it with my own eyes but I''m nervous)... So before I pull the trigger on getting it set I''m having one last think about changing it (is it just me or is it mental to think about this ALL day??)...

Ok so I wanted some advice from the experts. I''ve looked at the below choices... 2 are in the price range of my current stone, 1 is a little higher and the other alot more. I would like to know peoples thoughts on the stones chosen. Forget money for a minute and just consider the actual stones... If the more expensive one is AMAZING then perhaps i could do it... however it looks like the smaller ones are pretty fabulous and have better ASET and P&S gradings?

Would you change to any of these stones and why? PS. I''m putting this in a halo, and I''m not fussed about L/W ratio.. (i like square and rect)

My current stone is:
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6386/ and I recently listed information on it in an earlier post.


I''m considering changing to any from the below... Ideally I want high color but being a bloody woman I still want some size...

but i''m happy to go down in size for a gorgeous stone... here''s my thoughts before I pull the trigger on the production of the ring:

E SI2 1.05 - Looks great is rectangular but I don''t mind about this. Lovely color. Similar price point to current stone - small but higher in color.
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6906/

G SI1 1.04 - Gorgeous ASET!! Similar price point to above and current stone - is this a better option for the same price?
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6463/

FSI2 1.5 - Jon at GOG has told me its eyeclean. It''s not as spready as many other 1.5ct but everything else looks fabo I think? It''s $4k more than the above choices...
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6706/

And finally I was thinking if I wanted color, spread at an in between price of all of the above.. I considered a 4 main from GOG rather than the AVC??? (Remember I''ve not seen the AVC in person however felll in love ''online'' with it

... but this one looks big and bright and is in between the costs....
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6259/

any thoughts greatly apprieciated

I am puzzled by your budget

as it seems to be changing.

If you really want to evaluate warmth go to a store and look at I colored rounds away from the bright lights(like under a table), if the warmth bothers you then definitely go higher color.

IMO the larger sized AVCs really really shine and are most impressive 1.25Ct and above, that is when you really start to notice from far the large facets.

If you can afford it the F SI2 would be my choice, seems like a decent pricepoint due to the SI2 and depth of it.
IMO the AVCs really outshine that 4 main which while well cut for a 4 main really doesn''t compare in terms of chunky facets.

The cuts of all of these AVCs are fantastic I would ignore that part of it as they are not appreciably different when compared to color, depth and weight differences.

 

[Dreamer_D]

I think the G would be my pick if it was all about color, I like the shape.

Can he film a video of the G and the F next to one another and your original I? Or even a photo? I would be curious how much bigger the F looks to see if it is worth the extra $4k.

Off the top of my head, though, I don''t think I would spend $4k more for the F SI2... It is only about 10% larger in face up size compared to the I VVS that you have selected and about 16% larger than the G SI. Since you are haloing it, the extra size in the F SI2 compared to the G SI1 would *not* be noticable in my opinion. In a solitaire, maybe, but the halo is the great size equalizer

So my vote is the G.

 

[CushionNovice]

Date: 3/28/2010 11:32:25 PM
Author: ChunkyCushionLover

Date: 3/28/2010 11:05:49 PM
Author:CushionNovice
I''ve decided that my GOG AVC - I VVS2 is too warm for me (I haven''t seen it with my own eyes but I''m nervous)... So before I pull the trigger on getting it set I''m having one last think about changing it (is it just me or is it mental to think about this ALL day??)...

Ok so I wanted some advice from the experts. I''ve looked at the below choices... 2 are in the price range of my current stone, 1 is a little higher and the other alot more. I would like to know peoples thoughts on the stones chosen. Forget money for a minute and just consider the actual stones... If the more expensive one is AMAZING then perhaps i could do it... however it looks like the smaller ones are pretty fabulous and have better ASET and P&S gradings?

Would you change to any of these stones and why? PS. I''m putting this in a halo, and I''m not fussed about L/W ratio.. (i like square and rect)

My current stone is:
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6386/ and I recently listed information on it in an earlier post.


I''m considering changing to any from the below... Ideally I want high color but being a bloody woman I still want some size...

but i''m happy to go down in size for a gorgeous stone... here''s my thoughts before I pull the trigger on the production of the ring:

E SI2 1.05 - Looks great is rectangular but I don''t mind about this. Lovely color. Similar price point to current stone - small but higher in color.
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6906/

G SI1 1.04 - Gorgeous ASET!! Similar price point to above and current stone - is this a better option for the same price?
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6463/

FSI2 1.5 - Jon at GOG has told me its eyeclean. It''s not as spready as many other 1.5ct but everything else looks fabo I think? It''s $4k more than the above choices...
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6706/

And finally I was thinking if I wanted color, spread at an in between price of all of the above.. I considered a 4 main from GOG rather than the AVC??? (Remember I''ve not seen the AVC in person however felll in love ''online'' with it

... but this one looks big and bright and is in between the costs....
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6259/

any thoughts greatly apprieciated

I am puzzled by your budget

as it seems to be changing.

If you really want to evaluate warmth go to a store and look at I colored rounds away from the bright lights(like under a table), if the warmth bothers you then definitely go higher color.

IMO the larger sized AVCs really really shine and are most impressive 1.25Ct and above, that is when you really start to notice from far the large facets.

If you can afford it the F SI2 would be my choice, seems like a decent pricepoint due to the SI2 and depth of it.
IMO the AVCs really outshine that 4 main which while well cut for a 4 main really doesn''t compare in terms of chunky facets.

The cuts of all of these AVCs are fantastic I would ignore that part of it as they are not appreciably different when compared to color, depth and weight differences.

Thanks so much. Yes I too am puzzled by my budget!! It''s a long story, but yes there is a chance I could move on it if it was really worth it. Hence I thought I would weigh up my options before the build. No chance of upgrading in the future. This is my only shot! With regards to warmth, the problem is that every stone I have looked at in Australia, I can see warmth (apart from D,E,F)... However the confusing thing is that here there is A LOT of rubbish stones so I''m wondering if the cut is producing more color than the AVC would...Hence I thought I would just change my stone and go with higher color because then I know the whiter will make me happy. Really appreciate your input. Thanks ever so much .

 

[CushionNovice]

Date: 3/28/2010 11:36:22 PM
Author: dreamer_d
I think the G would be my pick if it was all about color, I like the shape.

Can he film a video of the G and the F next to one another and your original I? Or even a photo? I would be curious how much bigger the F looks to see if it is worth the extra $4k.

Off the top of my head, though, I don''t think I would spend $4k more for the F SI2... It is only about 10% larger in face up size compared to the I VVS that you have selected and about 16% larger than the G SI. Since you are haloing it, the extra size in the F SI2 compared to the G SI1 would *not* be noticable in my opinion. In a solitaire, maybe, but the halo is the great size equalizer

So my vote is the G.

Thanks Dreamer.. yes the real question here is ''is it worth $4k more''?.... if it were a little bigger it would be a no brainer... It''s really good to be able to sound board these thoughts here... I''ve noticed on these forums that you are a big believer that once haloed that size isn''t too much of a difference.. while I just look at the numbers and think it must all add up! Its lovely to have different opinions to consider..

thanks so much.

 

[CushionNovice]

WHOOOOPS.. Just realised I listed the wrong E color SI
My choice was this one - not the one i listed before (this one is more rectangular and has longer length than the length of my current stone) and it''s a little cheaper...

E SI1 1.05
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6037/

 

[ChunkyCushionLover]

Date: 3/28/2010 11:45:43 PM
Author: CushionNovice

Date: 3/28/2010 11:32:25 PM
Author: ChunkyCushionLover

Date: 3/28/2010 11:05:49 PM
Author:CushionNovice
I''ve decided that my GOG AVC - I VVS2 is too warm for me (I haven''t seen it with my own eyes but I''m nervous)... So before I pull the trigger on getting it set I''m having one last think about changing it (is it just me or is it mental to think about this ALL day??)...

Ok so I wanted some advice from the experts. I''ve looked at the below choices... 2 are in the price range of my current stone, 1 is a little higher and the other alot more. I would like to know peoples thoughts on the stones chosen. Forget money for a minute and just consider the actual stones... If the more expensive one is AMAZING then perhaps i could do it... however it looks like the smaller ones are pretty fabulous and have better ASET and P&S gradings?

Would you change to any of these stones and why? PS. I''m putting this in a halo, and I''m not fussed about L/W ratio.. (i like square and rect)

My current stone is:
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6386/ and I recently listed information on it in an earlier post.


I''m considering changing to any from the below... Ideally I want high color but being a bloody woman I still want some size...

but i''m happy to go down in size for a gorgeous stone... here''s my thoughts before I pull the trigger on the production of the ring:

E SI2 1.05 - Looks great is rectangular but I don''t mind about this. Lovely color. Similar price point to current stone - small but higher in color.
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6906/

G SI1 1.04 - Gorgeous ASET!! Similar price point to above and current stone - is this a better option for the same price?
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6463/

FSI2 1.5 - Jon at GOG has told me its eyeclean. It''s not as spready as many other 1.5ct but everything else looks fabo I think? It''s $4k more than the above choices...
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6706/

And finally I was thinking if I wanted color, spread at an in between price of all of the above.. I considered a 4 main from GOG rather than the AVC??? (Remember I''ve not seen the AVC in person however felll in love ''online'' with it

... but this one looks big and bright and is in between the costs....
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6259/

any thoughts greatly apprieciated

I am puzzled by your budget

as it seems to be changing.

If you really want to evaluate warmth go to a store and look at I colored rounds away from the bright lights(like under a table), if the warmth bothers you then definitely go higher color.

IMO the larger sized AVCs really really shine and are most impressive 1.25Ct and above, that is when you really start to notice from far the large facets.

If you can afford it the F SI2 would be my choice, seems like a decent pricepoint due to the SI2 and depth of it.
IMO the AVCs really outshine that 4 main which while well cut for a 4 main really doesn''t compare in terms of chunky facets.

The cuts of all of these AVCs are fantastic I would ignore that part of it as they are not appreciably different when compared to color, depth and weight differences.

Thanks so much. Yes I too am puzzled by my budget!! It''s a long story, but yes there is a chance I could move on it if it was really worth it. Hence I thought I would weigh up my options before the build. No chance of upgrading in the future. This is my only shot! With regards to warmth, the problem is that every stone I have looked at in Australia, I can see warmth (apart from D,E,F)... However the confusing thing is that here there is A LOT of rubbish stones so I''m wondering if the cut is producing more color than the AVC would...Hence I thought I would just change my stone and go with higher color because then I know the whiter will make me happy. Really appreciate your input. Thanks ever so much .

AVC will show more warmth than same color a round brilliant, probably more warmth than a poorly cut RBC even.
If thats the case then you are color sensitive and better stick to the higher colors.

Also you should know that the round melee will look whiter and brighter than any cushion centre even if they are the same color. Color is graded face down looking at the body, faceup small RBC will be whiter looking than a chunky faceted cushion of the same color.

I''d even consider going one or two grades lower in melee than you do in your centre as it will lessen this effect.
Considering your sensitivity to color I''d stick with F color and above for the centre.

 

[ChunkyCushionLover]

Date: 3/28/2010 11:59:19 PM
Author: CushionNovice
WHOOOOPS.. Just realised I listed the wrong E color SI
My choice was this one - not the one i listed before (this one is more rectangular and has longer length than the length of my current stone) and it''s a little cheaper...

E SI1 1.05
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6037/

I agree with DD, get a video with this one, the FSI2 and maybe the G SI1 as well. Sorry rhino if we are making you work

.

Also make sure he takes them out of the diamond dock and shows them side by side by the window so you can see the faceup and body color differences too.

 

[shimmer]

I have owned a 1.09 (6.2x5. and 1.3 (6.6x6.5) AVC, and would agree with CCN that the AV cushions are ideal in the 1.2+ range.

That said, the last one you posted (1.05 E SI) is a very nice compromise for the color, spread and price! I would ask for a video of it next to the others and if it had similar light performance it would be my choice. The aset looks a little different than the others that is why I would want to compare.

I did realize that I have a strong preference for a more square stone (my first stone was rectangular and second square), so if you prefer one over the other that would be my deciding factor because for *me* it made a big difference in the look. I love the G too, I almost bought it!

 

[CushionNovice]

Date: 3/29/2010 12:08:15 AM
Author: ChunkyCushionLover

Date: 3/28/2010 11:59:19 PM
Author: CushionNovice
WHOOOOPS.. Just realised I listed the wrong E color SI
My choice was this one - not the one i listed before (this one is more rectangular and has longer length than the length of my current stone) and it''s a little cheaper...

E SI1 1.05
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6037/

I agree with DD, get a video with this one, the FSI2 and maybe the G SI1 as well. Sorry rhino if we are making you work

.

Also make sure he takes them out of the diamond dock and shows them side by side by the window so you can see the faceup and body color differences too.

Thanks again - yes I think i have the dreaded color sensitive gene. darn it.
JBEG has advised me about the mellee color so that''s for backing that one up as well. FYI I am having single cut mellee in the setting as well. Ok so it looks like I''m deciding between the Fi2 1.5 OR the ESi1 1.05.... cool. Now to decide.

 

[CharmyPoo]

Agree with all the comments above. if I had to pick, I like the G the best.

 

[CushionNovice]

Date: 3/29/2010 12:15:30 AM
Author: shimmer
I have owned a 1.09 (6.2x5. and 1.3 (6.6x6.5) AVC, and would agree with CCN that the AV cushions are ideal in the 1.2+ range.

That said, the last one you posted (1.05 E SI) is a very nice compromise for the color, spread and price! I would ask for a video of it next to the others and if it had similar light performance it would be my choice. The aset looks a little different than the others that is why I would want to compare.

I did realize that I have a strong preference for a more square stone (my first stone was rectangular and second square), so if you prefer one over the other that would be my deciding factor because for *me* it made a big difference in the look. I love the G too, I almost bought it!

Thanks so much Shimmer.... if only the 1.5 was a little more spready (for the same price

) it would be easy! it''s 6.65 x 6.39 so it''s smaller than you 1.3. Cushions and their crazy specs!!

Color is the only thing i know what i like... the l/w ratio thing hasn''t bothered me so much. I love looking at the massive sqaure avc''s on here in the HW halo... but i know i can''t get that big, so the rectangular maybe a better way to get some spread.... ahh the things we do!

 

[CushionNovice]

Hi Charmy - so you would still pick the G over the last E I posted? I have read that you are color sensitive... so that means something about that G I guess!

 

[CushionNovice]

Date: 3/29/2010 12:22:29 AM
Author: CharmyPoo
Agree with all the comments above. if I had to pick, I like the G the best.

Hi Charmy - so you would still pick the G over the last E I posted? I have read that you are color sensitive... so that means something about that G I guess!

 

[ChunkyCushionLover]

Date: 3/29/2010 12:16:45 AM
Author: CushionNovice

Date: 3/29/2010 12:08:15 AM
Author: ChunkyCushionLover

Date: 3/28/2010 11:59:19 PM
Author: CushionNovice
WHOOOOPS.. Just realised I listed the wrong E color SI
My choice was this one - not the one i listed before (this one is more rectangular and has longer length than the length of my current stone) and it''s a little cheaper...

E SI1 1.05
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6037/

I agree with DD, get a video with this one, the FSI2 and maybe the G SI1 as well. Sorry rhino if we are making you work

.

Also make sure he takes them out of the diamond dock and shows them side by side by the window so you can see the faceup and body color differences too.

Thanks again - yes I think i have the dreaded color sensitive gene. darn it.
JBEG has advised me about the mellee color so that''s for backing that one up as well. FYI I am having single cut mellee in the setting as well. Ok so it looks like I''m deciding between the Fi2 1.5 OR the ESi1 1.05.... cool. Now to decide.

Single cuts are really nice we used them in these cushion earrings https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/suite-of-aquas-from-richard-homer-on-the-way.126730/page-3 designed by Ocean Pearlman.

 

[CushionNovice]

Date: 3/29/2010 12:44:51 AM
Author: ChunkyCushionLover

Date: 3/29/2010 12:16:45 AM
Author: CushionNovice

Date: 3/29/2010 12:08:15 AM
Author: ChunkyCushionLover

Date: 3/28/2010 11:59:19 PM
Author: CushionNovice
WHOOOOPS.. Just realised I listed the wrong E color SI
My choice was this one - not the one i listed before (this one is more rectangular and has longer length than the length of my current stone) and it''s a little cheaper...

E SI1 1.05
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6037/

I agree with DD, get a video with this one, the FSI2 and maybe the G SI1 as well. Sorry rhino if we are making you work

.

Also make sure he takes them out of the diamond dock and shows them side by side by the window so you can see the faceup and body color differences too.

Thanks again - yes I think i have the dreaded color sensitive gene. darn it.
JBEG has advised me about the mellee color so that''s for backing that one up as well. FYI I am having single cut mellee in the setting as well. Ok so it looks like I''m deciding between the Fi2 1.5 OR the ESi1 1.05.... cool. Now to decide.

Single cuts are really nice we used them in these cushion earrings https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/suite-of-aquas-from-richard-homer-on-the-way.126730/page-3 designed by Ocean Pearlman.

ohhhh - thanks for that. gorgeous! i was wondering if i would see a difference. I''m excited about them being in my halo...

 

[Dreamer_D]

Well, regarding the halo thing, lets think of it this way

The G diamond is about 5.93 x 6.15, which is 36.5 mm square.
The larger F diamond is 6.39 x 6.65, which is 42.5mm square.
So the difference is 6mm square, which is a 16% increase in size from the G to the F. Sounds lke a lot, eh?

Now lets add a halo. Assume the halo is 1mm thick. This adds 1mm to either side of the stone, or 2mm to either dimension.
So the G is now 7.93 x 8.15, which is 64.6mm square.
The F is now 8.39 x 8.65, which is 72.57.
So the difference is 8mm square, which is an increase of 12%. Not so much is it?

And this percentage increase would be even more limited if the halo was more than 1mm, which it most likely is, since a 1mm halo would use .005ct. diamonds

.

If the halo is 1.5mm wide, meaning .015ct diamonds, the visual size increase is only 10%.

So yes, the halo is indeed the great visual equalizer.

 

[CushionNovice]

Date: 3/29/2010 1:15:22 AM
Author: dreamer_d
Well, regarding the halo thing, lets think of it this way

The G diamond is about 5.93 x 6.15, which is 36.5 mm square.
The larger F diamond is 6.39 x 6.65, which is 42.5mm square.
So the difference is 6mm square, which is a 16% increase in size from the G to the F. Sounds lke a lot, eh?

Now lets add a halo. Assume the halo is 1mm thick. This adds 1mm to either side of the stone, or 2mm to either dimension.
So the G is now 7.93 x 8.15, which is 64.6mm square.
The F is now 8.39 x 8.65, which is 72.57.
So the difference is 8mm square, which is an increase of 12%. Not so much is it?

And this percentage increase would be even more limited if the halo was more than 1mm, which it most likely is, since a 1mm halo would use .005ct. diamonds

.

If the halo is 1.5mm wide, meaning .015ct diamonds, the visual size increase is only 10%.

So yes, the halo is indeed the great visual equalizer.

THANKS SO MUCH!! I love that!

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 3/28/2010 11:05:49 PM
Author:CushionNovice
I've decided that my GOG AVC - I VVS2 is too warm for me (I haven't seen it with my own eyes but I'm nervous)... So before I pull the trigger on getting it set I'm having one last think about changing it (is it just me or is it mental to think about this ALL day??)...

If you are having serious doubts and bearing in mind it is possible that these shapes might show a little more warmth than a well cut round then I would consider moving up in colour but what I would do first is tell Jon your concerns about the colour and see what he says.

 

[CushionNovice]

Date: 3/29/2010 4:56:37 AM
Author: Lorelei

Date: 3/28/2010 11:05:49 PM
Author:CushionNovice
I''ve decided that my GOG AVC - I VVS2 is too warm for me (I haven''t seen it with my own eyes but I''m nervous)... So before I pull the trigger on getting it set I''m having one last think about changing it (is it just me or is it mental to think about this ALL day??)...

If you are having serious doubts and bearing in mind it is possible that these shapes might show a little more warmth than a well cut round then I would consider moving up in colour but what I would do first is tell Jon your concerns about the colour and see what he says.

Thank you Lorelei, yes I have spoken to Jon, who tells me the I is very white.... but I just know I need to change... once it''s in the ring it''s a big hassle to change it. So i think moving up in colour is the way to go. Just need to choose now... cheers

 

[CharmyPoo]

Date: 3/29/2010 12:25:53 AM
Author: CushionNovice
Hi Charmy - so you would still pick the G over the last E I posted? I have read that you are color sensitive... so that means something about that G I guess!

Beyond being color sensitive, I am also clarity and shape sensitive. Hehehe. I find that the G is an overall more appealing diamond. The shape is nicer than the E SI2 which the SI2 was a turn a off for me. The E SI1 ASET is not as nice as the G and too rectangular for me. I was purely picking based on my own preference.

In wearing my G over the past few months (I never wore it prior), I find it very pretty and looks plenty white in day to day conditions. There isn''t any indication of color.

 

[Dreamer_D]

Date: 3/29/2010 11:19:26 AM
Author: CharmyPoo

Date: 3/29/2010 12:25:53 AM
Author: CushionNovice
Hi Charmy - so you would still pick the G over the last E I posted? I have read that you are color sensitive... so that means something about that G I guess!

Beyond being color sensitive, I am also clarity and shape sensitive. Hehehe. I find that the G is an overall more appealing diamond. The shape is nicer than the E SI2 which the SI2 was a turn a off for me. The E SI1 ASET is not as nice as the G and too rectangular for me. I was purely picking based on my own preference.

In wearing my G over the past few months (I never wore it prior), I find it very pretty and looks plenty white in day to day conditions. There isn''t any indication of color.

hehe Charmy.

I have a G too, and though it is an RB, I can tell you it is very very completely white. My friend has an E, and though there *is* a slight difference when we compare them side by side (the E has a stark or crisp white appearance compared to the G), it is very slight. I actually prefer the color of a G and would not go higher in color even if offered the chance. But again, that is just my personal take on things

 

[CharmyPoo]

Date: 3/29/2010 11:47:45 AM
Author: dreamer_d

hehe Charmy.

I have a G too, and though it is an RB, I can tell you it is very very completely white. My friend has an E, and though there *is* a slight difference when we compare them side by side (the E has a stark or crisp white appearance compared to the G), it is very slight. I actually prefer the color of a G and would not go higher in color even if offered the chance. But again, that is just my personal take on things

I will let you know how I feel once I have both rings I have a strange feeling that I might end up liking the G more. Isn''t it strange that our taste change?

 

[CushionNovice]

many thanks everyone x