sparkles31
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2006
- Messages
- 20
Since you were looking for radiants 17-2cts...Date: 1/10/2006 11:59:41 AM
Author:sparkles31
Which determines how large a radiant actually looks from the top?
Surface size, not weight - stones of the same weight can look quite different in size and the larger the weight, the more obvious this is.
Could you actually go by just measurements instead of carat size?
IMO, yes, sure.
Yes definitely!!! It looks beautiful!!!!Date: 1/10/2006 12:12:17 PM
Author: albicocca
For an example, look at my ring. It''s a cushion and it''s only 1.08 but EVERYONE thinks it looks a lot bigger than that, b/c apparently the spread is more like a 1.5. But it''s still cut really well and sparkles like crazy, so you would never guess that it''s cut shallow! So I''m all for choosing based on mm dimensions!![]()