Can''t decide between rings- PLEASE HELP!!!!

[grade7teacher]

Good morning-
Being new here- I am hoping someone can help me.
I have GIA reports on 3 stones- and don''t know which to go with.
All are cushion- here is the info:

Stone 1
Cushion Brilliant 8.95 x 7.05 x 4.91
2.50 carat
G color
SI1
Polish very good
Symmetry Good
Fluorescence faint
thin - extremely thick faceted girdle
57% across top
69.6% across stone

Stone 2
Cushion Modified Brilliant 8.85 x 7.65 x 4.98
2.50 carat
F color
SI1
Polish excellent
Symmetry very Good
Fluorescence medium blue
medium to thick faceted girdle
59% across top
65.1% across stone
comments: additional clouds are not shown; surface graining is not shown

Stone 3
Cushion Brilliant 8.15 x 6.68 x. 4.61
2.13 carat
F color
VS2
Polish excellent
Symmetry Very Good
Fluorescence none
extremely thick faceted grdle
61% across top
69% across stone
Comments: Additional clouds are not shown
Crown angles are greater than 40 degrees

Any ideas which is the better stone?
Many thanks!

 

[stone-cold11]

Cushions need to be seen, images and ASET, can''t be select by numbers. Sorry. Maybe try going with a vendor to pick one for you. Most here recommend Mark of ERD or Jon of GOG.

 

[DiamondFlame]

Just want to clarify some of the terms you used.

Across top = % table?
Across stone = % depth?

GIA reports would be using ''table'', ''depth''.

Have you seen these stones in person? You can''t really pick out great cushions without at least looking at their pictures and ASET images. And 2.5 carat would be too hefty an investment without actually giving those cushions an eyeball...

 

[Lorelei]

Welcome!

Can you get at least photos of these diamonds? That would be a big help, cushions need to be seen to be judged. Other images such as ASET are very useful to if you can get them, these help to evaluate the light return of the diamond. I take it by your measurements you mean table and depth? Also have you seen any of these diamonds in person?