shape
carat
color
clarity

Calling Emerald cut lovers - opinions?

ecf8503

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
4,095
Last edited:

Karl_K

Super_Ideal_Rock
Trade
Joined
Aug 4, 2008
Messages
14,685
1st one has bad p3 angles.
Haven't looked at the rest yet, maybe tonight but what are the numbers from the report on each? cvd?
 
Last edited:

Karl_K

Super_Ideal_Rock
Trade
Joined
Aug 4, 2008
Messages
14,685
2 maybe, need more info.
3 has both cut and crystal issues. cvd?
more later
 

ecf8503

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
4,095
#1 -

1693333645424.png

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#2 -
1693333727266.png
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

#3 -
1693333777917.png
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

#4 -
1693333810787.png

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

#5 -
1693333847715.png
 

Karl_K

Super_Ideal_Rock
Trade
Joined
Aug 4, 2008
Messages
14,685
add 4 to your short list slightly ahead of 2.
The video does not show crystal issues as well as some other videos but im not seeing major ones.
@DejaWiz can you see if you can hunt up more videos on #4?

5 has a couple areas I'm not sure about, for the most part it looks good but based on current info I would call it undetermined.

Of the first 5 I think #4 has the most potential.

Please post the numbers for the rest.
 

ecf8503

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
4,095
#6 - 1693341679702.png


#7 - 1693341744969.png



#8 - 1693341777840.png

#9 - 1693341820649.png

#10 - 1693341848462.png
 

Attachments

  • 1693341327550.png
    1693341327550.png
    7.3 KB · Views: 11
  • 1693341288430.png
    1693341288430.png
    7 KB · Views: 12
  • 1693341251795.png
    1693341251795.png
    7.1 KB · Views: 10
  • 1693341203950.png
    1693341203950.png
    7.3 KB · Views: 9
  • 1693341356603.png
    1693341356603.png
    7.4 KB · Views: 14
Last edited:

Karl_K

Super_Ideal_Rock
Trade
Joined
Aug 4, 2008
Messages
14,685
6 looks good.
7 too much of the stone goes dark at once.
8 is a big no, clearly the worst of the lot.
9 looks good
10 has a largish zone that goes dark all at once but not as much as 7. Overall looks good.

6,9,10 ask b2c for ASET images.
If they have them in stock they may be able to do so.
Which leaves 4 and maybe 5 above to see if you can get more info.
With no more info but a good return policy 4 or 6 or 9 are the highest potential ones to look at in person during a return period.
 

ecf8503

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
4,095
Thank you SO much - I really appreciate your input!
 

Ibrakeforpossums

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 21, 2019
Messages
2,542
I can't believe the prices on these huge EC labs! Who are you working with at B2C?
 

ecf8503

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
4,095

Ibrakeforpossums

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 21, 2019
Messages
2,542
I dealt with Alex and Simon and I adored them but that was a while ago. Let us know how you find Jane.
 

ecf8503

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
4,095

ecf8503

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
4,095
If anyone has any recommendations for other stones, I'll take a look!
 

DejaWiz

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
5,988
add 4 to your short list slightly ahead of 2.
The video does not show crystal issues as well as some other videos but im not seeing major ones.
@DejaWiz can you see if you can hunt up more videos on #4?

5 has a couple areas I'm not sure about, for the most part it looks good but based on current info I would call it undetermined.

Of the first 5 I think #4 has the most potential.

Please post the numbers for the rest.

I'll need the grading report number to run some searches.
 

ecf8503

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
4,095
LG591306727
 

ecf8503

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
4,095

ecf8503

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
4,095
Thank you @DejaWiz - I believe those are the same videos I found, do you have an opinion on anything?
 

ecf8503

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
4,095
UPDATE!!!

So I Ordered #9 - 4.28ct G VS2

It came in a black display box, and I immediately I noticed 2 black lines / long facets, one on either side of the keel / culet. When I place it on my hand, I can see my skin through those windows.

I have a couple of other step cuts, and none of them do this. I don't know if I'm being too critical or if this will go away once set?


So I ordered a second one so I can compare in person 4.30ct F VS2

While waiting for them to secure it, they called me. Wanted to know why I was dissatisfied with the 4.28, did I realize they're the same dimensions (which I did, on purpose), the F is better than G but that's the only difference, so do I really want the 4.30 too. I tried to explain the windowing I was seeing in the 4.28, he asked if I had looked at the videos of the stones (duh!), but eventually acquiesced and said they will get the 4.30 for me. Just a weird vibe.

AITA? I just want a beautiful stone, and for some reason the 4.28 just isn't "scratching that itch".

The 4.28 is still showing as "available" on Brilliance, and you can see the video of it there:
https://www.brilliance.com/lab-grow...make-vs2-clarity-igi-certified-SKU-LG20095486

The 4.30 video can be seen on Adiamor (yes I see the inclusions; my close up vision is not so good anymore, and with their location, I am hoping it will be acceptably clean):
https://www.adiamor.com/Lab-Diamonds/4.30-ct-F-VS2-Affinity-Cut-Emerald-Diamond/D52387671

Or should I go for #6 above
https://www.b2cjewels.com/dd/21315928/Emerald-Diamond-H-Color-VS1-Clarity

Thoughts?
 

Ibrakeforpossums

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 21, 2019
Messages
2,542
I didn't see the windowing on the video, had to stop it to see what you're talking about. You're sending the 4.28 back, right? You'll never unsee those windows.
 

ecf8503

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
4,095
Yes the 4.28 is the one I see the windowing in.

How does the 4.30 video look in comparison?
 

Ibrakeforpossums

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 21, 2019
Messages
2,542
The 4.30 looks better, although there might be a tilt window that's too apparent. Ask for more opinions, I don't trust my eyes.
Inclusions, I don't see them.
 

Karl_K

Super_Ideal_Rock
Trade
Joined
Aug 4, 2008
Messages
14,685
Its never sure until you see them. Even with ASET video and pics it just shows potential.
If a stone dont speak to you it dont speak to you.
 

ecf8503

Ideal_Rock
Premium
Joined
Feb 14, 2005
Messages
4,095
If a stone dont speak to you it dont speak to you.

Exactly!

I will try to get some decent pics of the 4.28 tomorrow.
 

Ibrakeforpossums

Ideal_Rock
Joined
Mar 21, 2019
Messages
2,542
What I do: I watch the video and stop the rotation with these <and >. Advance one click at a time, you can see if the facets turn on and off or stay static (not good). Also try minimizing the video to very small, easier to get an impression.
But most of all, do what Karl said, hold it and turn in different lighting conditions, see if it stays lovely. ECs defy formulaic judgement, part of what I love about them.
 
Be a part of the community Get 3 HCA Results
Top