brilliance/contrast/is

[targa]

I have confused myself a bit and would love to be set straight.

i am looking for the maximum brilliance and scintillation i can get in a rb stone ( less interested in fire).
when looking at an IS image, the more light return the better (so red good) but don''t you have to have some pink in the IS to provide contrast to maximize the scintillation and brilliance?
for example, on the IS posted here,wouldn''t a bit more pink in the table provide better scintillation?

http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?cid=131&item=315330&scsize=1024

btw, i am considering this stone to replace one that i almost got from WF-(thread-- bad experience with whiteflash)
any advice or thoughts on this stone?

thanks

 

[strmrdr]

there are layers and layers and layers to answering that question but in the end the answer is no.
The girdle is cut for contrast which is a good thing for what your looking for.
The crown and pavilion angles work well together.
The lgf% is in the sweet zone


The arrows look good.

id want to check the hearts

over all a very nice diamond.

btw the megascope report is smokin dope level of being off.
The ags report and the IS image dont come close to agreeing with the numbers it gives.

have it checked for being eyeclean.

 

[targa]

yes, i hadnt noticed that before- which should i believe, ags or the megascope?

 

[strmrdr]

Date: 1/3/2006 3:30:47 PM
Author: targa
yes, i hadnt noticed that before- which should i believe, ags or the megascope?

ags + IS trump megascope.
megascope is known to put it kindly be less than accurate.