HawaiianScottsman posted these specs on two Blue Nile stones:
Here are the numbers:
1.31 RB
Bluenile LD00527264
Diam 7.07mm (7.04-7.09)
Depth 4.34mm 61.4%
Crown 35.0’ 15.1% 0
Pavil 40.7’ 43.1% 0
Table 4.02mm 57% 0
Culet 0.9% very. Small 0
Girdle 1.0thin – 1.2 thin 1.0% 0
1.40 RB
Bluenile LD00529298
Diam 7.25 (7.23 –7.2
Total depth % 61.2 4.44mm
Crown angle ‘34.9 (34.7 – 35.0) 0
Crown height %15.6 (15.4 – 15.
Pavil angle 40.8 (40.7 – 41.0)
Pavil depth % 43.1 (43.0 –43.3) 0
Culet % 0.5 vsmall 0
Table size % 54.9 (54.7 – 55.2) 0
Girdle 1.1% (0.7 – 1.6) 0
Thin
Proportion 0
Thank you!
Well....I plugged the numbers into the good ole cut advisor, and the results were:
stone #1 - 1.3, Ex Ex Ex Vg
stone #2 - 1.4, Ex Ex Ex Vg.
Pretty darn equal on that account. Thought I'd try to save some of the experts who will hopefully be responding a little trouble. I don't know how the prices measure up. One might be concerned about the thin girdles, and you should probably see magnified pics of the diamonds to check on visibility of the inclusions.
Just my very slightly educated opinion!
-Melissa
