Allisonfaye
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2004
- Messages
- 1,456
You mentioned an upgraded ring in one of your posts, right? If so, do you have any photos?5 carats
10 carat center should get me good edge to edge coverage or else I'm removing a RIB from my fingerYou mean, like a fancy setting with a large center stone?
Haha. You’re funny. I wonder if those with larger stones (10+ carats) have safety concerns when wearing the ring in public.10 carat center should get me good edge to edge coverage or else I'm removing a RIB from my finger![]()
Always lie and say it's fake. Nordstrom has the best crystals! BahahahahahHaha. You’re funny. I wonder if those with larger stones (10+ carats) have safety concerns when wearing the ring in public.![]()
Haha! Yes, I have noticed Nordstrom carries decent quality costume jewelry.Always lie and say it's fake. Nordstrom has the best crystals! Bahahahahah
What are the measurements of your 3.3?In a round probably a 9.8 mm. I had one that size that I returned due to color. Actually now that I think about it, I remember thinking it was too big and feeling uncomfortable at a dinner with my husband’s family. I actually turned it around to my palm so they wouldn’t see it. I wonder if I was more uncomfortable about size or color tho.
Well I actually returned the 3.3 but it was 9.54 mm average.What are the measurements of your 3.3?
I must have missed your thread on your 3.098. What are the specs?Well I actually returned the 3.3 but it was 9.54 mm average.
My new ACA is 3.098 and it is 9.35 mm average.
I honestly don’t notice much size difference between the 3.3 and 3.1. Whiteflash was even able to set the new one into the same Stuller setting.
No, I haven’t made a thread on it. I did add pics on the last page of my 3.321 thread. I want to permanently set it first.I must have missed your thread on your 3.098. What are the specs?![]()
Nice.No, I haven’t made a thread on it. I did add pics on the last page of my 3.321 thread. I want to permanently set it first.
It’s an I VS1 ACA.
Hi, no, the 3.3 doesn’t have internal graining listed. I don’t know what those lines were to be honest. I previously had a G (which later graded as an F when it was sent back to AGS for recert) VS1 ACA and it had internal graining listed but I never saw it. I was told in a thread I made that that was probably what it was. I personal think they were polish lines.Nice.So, you were able to see the internal graining in your 3.3? I think mine has internal graining as one of the characteristics as well, but how were you able to see it with unaided eye?
I see the lines, and that was the 3.3? The moissanite is the one that looks like an antique cut?Here is what I mean. This is with a moissanite by the way. In direct sunlight the diamond appeared cloudy. I know it wasn’t dirty bc I’m pretty anal about keeping it clean and have an ultrasonic machine.
It’s the ring on top.
But in indirect sunlight the diamond looked fine. Again it wasn’t always that cloudy but that picture really shows what I mean.
Sorry to hijack this thread!!!!
Yes. The moissanite is an OEC. It has the 8 prongs while the 3.3 had the 6 prongs.I see the lines, and that was the 3.3? The moissanite is the one that looks like an antique cut?
I know what you mean. Glad you found one that you’re happy with.Yes. The moissanite is an OEC. It has the 8 prongs while the 3.3 had the 6 prongs.
Again, from just looking at it you wouldn’t see it I think. But after knowing it was there and having diamonds that don’t have those lines, I would rather just have one without them for peace of mind.