Find your diamond
Find your jewelry
shape
carat
color
clarity

Best 2.0 ct Round Diamond $12K could buy ?

Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
I

iameuro

Rough_Rock
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
10

Hi All,


My first post on here.. GREAT SITE !


I am in the market to purchase a diamond for an engagement ring and I''m obviously trying to get the best for my money.


I want a 2.0ct Round Diamond ( don’t want to go lower than 1.9ct ) with good cut and no eye visible inclusions. My budget is around $12K....


Can some of you knowledgeable folks on this website suggest what kind of stone can I aim for ?


I was thinking I don’t want to go below SI2 and nothing lower than color I..

My lady''s preference is the size over quality of the stone, but I''d like to get a decent quality as well.

Thank you all !!!!
33.gif
 
Date: 1/27/2009 3:01:53 PM
Author:iameuro



Hi All,





My first post on here.. GREAT SITE !





I am in the market to purchase a diamond for an engagement ring and I'm obviously trying to get the best for my money.





I want a 2.0ct Round Diamond ( don’t want to go lower than 1.9ct ) with good cut and no eye visible inclusions. My budget is around $12K....





Can some of you knowledgeable folks on this website suggest what kind of stone can I aim for ?





I was thinking I don’t want to go below SI2 and nothing lower than color I..

My lady's preference is the size over quality of the stone, but I'd like to get a decent quality as well.

Thank you all !!!!
33.gif
Click to expand...
Welcome!

I had a quick look and found this one, check it is eyeclean to your standards though and that the fluorescence doesn't make the diamond look cloudy, it will be a challenge to find that size for the budget but this one might fit the bill.

http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/F-SI2-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1107217.asp?b=16&a=12&c=77&cid=131
 
Yeah, that stone has been hanging around awhile, waiting for someone wanting a 2 ct with a low budget.
 
Wow- that stone looks very nice- and the price is fantasitc!
Great find guys!

I agree- you would not go wrong with that lovely diamond if JA confirms that it''s eye clean.
 
Date: 1/27/2009 3:17:49 PM
Author: Rockdiamond
Wow- that stone looks very nice- and the price is fantasitc!
Great find guys!

I agree- you would not go wrong with that lovely diamond if JA confirms that it''s eye clean.
Click to expand...
Thanks David, I had to laugh to see both of us posted it!
 
Thank you all for a quick reply, but I am not sure about that stone...
maybe its the way the picture was taken, but it looks as if there are numerous cracks on the sides of the diamond.
 
It''s really not possible to give a 100% answer to that question without being able to see the diamond in person- but based on the photo I doubt that what you''re seeing are "cracks"

To me, this looks like a great SI2- enough imperfection to lower the price, but it''s not concentrated in one area, meaning it might be eye clean.
 
Date: 1/27/2009 3:33:42 PM
Author: Rockdiamond
It's really not possible to give a 100% answer to that question without being able to see the diamond in person- but based on the photo I doubt that what you're seeing are 'cracks'

To me, this looks like a great SI2- enough imperfection to lower the price, but it's not concentrated in one area, meaning it might be eye clean.
Click to expand...
Ditto, and it is unlikely that they are any kind of issue but the best thing to do is to check with the vendor, JA will be honest with you and if it is eyeclean then it could be a great buy. 2cts is a large diamond and unless you are prepared to increase the budget or go smaller then it is not going to be easy to find many diamonds to choose from unfortunately so I would at least inquire about this one before dismissing it. Bear in mind these photos are greatly magnified and the size of the diamond in reality is far removed from the image you see there which is created with showing clients inclusions in mind.
 
they aren''t "cracks." There''s stuff. Not cracks.
 
Hey there, you will definitely have inclusions in a 2 ct stone that you buy for only $12K, but you should realize that the inclusions that are visible in the web pics that are 40X magnified most likely will be invisible to the naked eye. Good luck!
 
Date: 1/27/2009 4:04:18 PM
Author: Steel
Hi iameuro,

Welcome to PS!

I would not throw this J out of bed for eating crackers
9.gif
:

http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/J-SI2-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1163135.asp

I think the flour makes it works a look.
Click to expand...
Neither would I if he would be agreeable to a J colour and could squeeeeeze the budget a bit more
28.gif
....iam, if you like the look of this one, ask JA for the proportions such as the depth, table, angles etc. It looks like a well cut rock - nice find Steely babes!
36.gif
36.gif
36.gif
36.gif
 
Date: 1/27/2009 4:11:38 PM
Author: Lorelei

Date: 1/27/2009 4:04:18 PM
Author: Steel
Hi iameuro,

Welcome to PS!

I would not throw this J out of bed for eating crackers
9.gif
:

http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/J-SI2-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1163135.asp

I think the flour makes it works a look.
Click to expand...
Neither would I if he would be agreeable to a J colour and could squeeeeeze the budget a bit more
28.gif
....iam, if you like the look of this one, ask JA for the proportions such as the depth, table, angles etc. It looks like a well cut rock - nice find Steely babes!
36.gif
36.gif
36.gif
36.gif
Click to expand...
Whoops! I should let information get from my eyes to my brain once in a while huh!!!!!!!!! I was convinced the budget was 13k. God knows why, but I sure was convinced. Perhaps JA could slice a corner off to make it fit into budget? After that, I am out of ideas
26.gif
.
 
Date: 1/27/2009 4:25:55 PM
Author: Rockdiamond
Date: 1/27/2009 4:19:17 PM

Author: JulieN


Date: 1/27/2009 4:16:48 PM

Author: vespergirl

Or this one:


http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/I-SI2-Premium-Cut-Round-Diamond-1020348.asp
Click to expand...

This one is not good.
Click to expand...
I ask this with all due respect JulieN- why do you feel that this stone is not good?
Click to expand...

Nasty picture. There is yellow and black under the table. Some of the arrows appear white (instead of black.) Large table reflection. I don't need to look at the numbers to know it's deep and leaky.
 
Maybe because it gets a 5.3 on the HCA?
 
I think you need to adjust something...either the size or the budget, because you''ll be making some kind of a big compormise if you want a 2 carat stone for $12,000. You could get a really nice 1.5-1.6 for that price. But I''m betting those SI2''s under $12,000 are not totally eyeclean from all sides.
 
Date: 1/27/2009 4:39:05 PM
Author: JulieN

Date: 1/27/2009 4:25:55 PM
Author: Rockdiamond

Date: 1/27/2009 4:19:17 PM

Author: JulieN



Date: 1/27/2009 4:16:48 PM

Author: vespergirl

Or this one:


http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/I-SI2-Premium-Cut-Round-Diamond-1020348.asp
Click to expand...

This one is not good.
Click to expand...
I ask this with all due respect JulieN- why do you feel that this stone is not good?
Click to expand...

Nasty picture. There is yellow and black under the table. Some of the arrows appear white (instead of black.) Large table reflection. I don''t need to look at the numbers to know it''s deep and leaky.
Click to expand...
Julie- I write this with all due respect- hopefully you''ll be open to at least hearing a different viewpoint:
I also looked at the photo- and the listing.
My personal preference is for a slightly more shallow stone, with a larger table.
BUT I respectfully disagree that the photo looks bad- nor would I eliminate the diamond for the reasons of light leakage.

Generally speaking ( although I have not seen this particular diamond in person) if a cutter goes below a benchmark, like 2.00 carats ( the stone in question is 1.95cts) they are not going to try and "save weight" which might result in a bad cut.
You will see that happening in some stones that land on the benchmark ( such a s a 2.00carat diamond)
It''s not a guarantee that a 1.95 will be well cut and the 2.00 not well cut...but I''d still consider the 1.95 if it was me......
 
//
Julie- I write this with all due respect- hopefully you'll be open to at least hearing a different viewpoint:

I also looked at the photo- and the listing.

My personal preference is for a slightly more shallow stone, with a larger table.

BUT I respectfully disagree that the photo looks bad- nor would I eliminate the diamond for the reasons of light leakage.


Generally speaking ( although I have not seen this particular diamond in person) if a cutter goes below a benchmark, like 2.00 carats ( the stone in question is 1.95cts) they are not going to try and 'save weight' which might result in a bad cut.

You will see that happening in some stones that land on the benchmark ( such a s a 2.00carat diamond)

It's not a guarantee that a 1.95 will be well cut and the 2.00 not well cut...but I'd still consider the 1.95 if it was me......
//


It's fine to like shallow stones with large tables. But this stone just has a large table, and is not shallow at all?
 
Julie- as I mentioned, my personal preference would be a 60% table, and 60% depth ( providing all the other aspect such as the Girdle are in line)
Such a stone would not be considered "shallow" or having a large table

Likewise, I do not feel that 59% is considered a "large" table.

Of course this is personal preference- which is why I would not eliminate the 1.95ct.
That stone does have an 8mm spread- so it will appear to many as a 2.00carat diamond in terms of size.
 
You're right that 59% is not a large table.

But if you say that you like larger tables and shallower stones ...and this stone is neither of those, then I am not sure...exactly...what we are talking about. (Other than you don't think the picture is nasty or that it is particularly leaky.)
 
Date: 1/27/2009 3:42:50 PM
Author: Lorelei

Date: 1/27/2009 3:33:42 PM
Author: Rockdiamond
It''s really not possible to give a 100% answer to that question without being able to see the diamond in person- but based on the photo I doubt that what you''re seeing are ''cracks''

To me, this looks like a great SI2- enough imperfection to lower the price, but it''s not concentrated in one area, meaning it might be eye clean.
Click to expand...
Ditto, and it is unlikely that they are any kind of issue but the best thing to do is to check with the vendor, JA will be honest with you and if it is eyeclean then it could be a great buy. 2cts is a large diamond and unless you are prepared to increase the budget or go smaller then it is not going to be easy to find many diamonds to choose from unfortunately so I would at least inquire about this one before dismissing it. Bear in mind these photos are greatly magnified and the size of the diamond in reality is far removed from the image you see there which is created with showing clients inclusions in mind.
Click to expand...
I second both these comments.

At the end of the day, it is a small (relative) budget that we are dealing with for a large stone. It can be done, but of course there will be some compromise involved. Ideally, the aim is that the size and sparkle still have the wow factor despite the diamonds flaws. My personal experience is that size does help alot in the wow factor.....AND even a diamond with less than perfect cut, and clarity can still hold their own.
 
Julie: Although the 1.95ct diamond does not fit the picture of "my perfect cut", I still believe that it is very likely a great looking stone in person. Certainly not one to dismiss offhand, IMO.
My belief is based on the photo, proportions, as well as the GIA "EX" Cut grade
 
Date: 1/27/2009 5:30:24 PM
Author: Sharon101

Date: 1/27/2009 3:42:50 PM
Author: Lorelei


Date: 1/27/2009 3:33:42 PM
Author: Rockdiamond
It''s really not possible to give a 100% answer to that question without being able to see the diamond in person- but based on the photo I doubt that what you''re seeing are ''cracks''

To me, this looks like a great SI2- enough imperfection to lower the price, but it''s not concentrated in one area, meaning it might be eye clean.
Click to expand...
Ditto, and it is unlikely that they are any kind of issue but the best thing to do is to check with the vendor, JA will be honest with you and if it is eyeclean then it could be a great buy. 2cts is a large diamond and unless you are prepared to increase the budget or go smaller then it is not going to be easy to find many diamonds to choose from unfortunately so I would at least inquire about this one before dismissing it. Bear in mind these photos are greatly magnified and the size of the diamond in reality is far removed from the image you see there which is created with showing clients inclusions in mind.
Click to expand...
I second both these comments.

At the end of the day, it is a small (relative) budget that we are dealing with for a large stone. It can be done, but of course there will be some compromise involved. Ideally, the aim is that the size and sparkle still have the wow factor despite the diamonds flaws. My personal experience is that size does help alot in the wow factor.....AND even a diamond with less than perfect cut, and clarity can still hold their own.
Click to expand...
I agree with Sharon - the original poster mentioned that his fiancee is happy to compromise other specs to get a large size, and I know many women with 3-4 ct diamonds with "good" cut whose rings get more attention than my 2 ct ideal H&A simply because they are much bigger. If she is happy with a larger, decent stone that will get a lot of attention, she shouldn''t be forced to have a smaller stone just because the cut is better if that''s not what she wants.
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Jewelry Blog
PriceScope-Concierge-Ad
Find prime cuts.
Top