Sorry, but too much leakage under the table for me. Some imperfections in the hearts where the "pigeon toes" (thanks for the term @denverappraiser !) are a bit long on one side of the heart than the other and they have variation in size between them (12, 9, 11 show this the most).
Hi, this is a nice ASET, poorly taken is the issue. The ASET scope is too far away from the stone, you can tell from the hint of green in the arrows, suggesting the pavilion mains are reflecting some <45 degree light (isn't true) which means the ASET is too high up.
Not H&A but not terrible!
Should be a good performing stone, all depends on price if it's better or worse for you compared to the stones above.
I stand corrected! I did not notice the green arrows. So, @gm89uk, if the scope was closer...it would look like less leakage (i.e., under the table would be less white/grey)?
The heart image also suffers from incorrect alignment.
The stone is better than the image indicates but im not making a positive h&a call on a bad image.