I just recieved the appraisal report in the mail for my engagement ring. My jaw nearly fell to the floor, as it appraised at nearly 2x what we paid for the stone & setting. I realize there is some inflating, but is such a large cushion common, or did we really get a bit better deal than we thought? Here is some background info...
The appraiser was completely independent from either of the sellers I purchased from. She has a Senior Graduate Gemologist certification from GIA, as well as a cert. from FGA (not sure exactly what it was, but the Fellow Gemologist something-or-other from Europe...sorry, don''t mean to offend anyone, but I don''t have the report in front of me). We also did not reveal what we paid for the ring, so the figure she came up with was on her own.
In case the stone or setting would influence the value/price paid ratio, here is the info:
Stone - .91 asscher (not royal)/square emerald cut, H color, VS1 clarity, table & depth are both in the 60''s (I''m pretty sure the table was 65, but not sure on the depth)
Setting - 18K white, pave-set split band with square plateau surrounded by pave that the stone sits on. pave stones are G-I in color, SI 1 clarity, & there are 60 of them on the whole setting.
TCW for both is estimated at 1.87 for both (If I recall the report correctly).
Paid $4500, & the appraisal came back at $8950 + tax.
First & foremost, we are very pleased with the ring, & feel it was a very good price regardless. What I am wondering is now will we be paying more than necessary to insure it on our homeowners, (& how to remedy this if so), & of course, what I asked above...did we get a better deal than we thought?
Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
-Tracey
The appraiser was completely independent from either of the sellers I purchased from. She has a Senior Graduate Gemologist certification from GIA, as well as a cert. from FGA (not sure exactly what it was, but the Fellow Gemologist something-or-other from Europe...sorry, don''t mean to offend anyone, but I don''t have the report in front of me). We also did not reveal what we paid for the ring, so the figure she came up with was on her own.
In case the stone or setting would influence the value/price paid ratio, here is the info:
Stone - .91 asscher (not royal)/square emerald cut, H color, VS1 clarity, table & depth are both in the 60''s (I''m pretty sure the table was 65, but not sure on the depth)
Setting - 18K white, pave-set split band with square plateau surrounded by pave that the stone sits on. pave stones are G-I in color, SI 1 clarity, & there are 60 of them on the whole setting.
TCW for both is estimated at 1.87 for both (If I recall the report correctly).
Paid $4500, & the appraisal came back at $8950 + tax.
First & foremost, we are very pleased with the ring, & feel it was a very good price regardless. What I am wondering is now will we be paying more than necessary to insure it on our homeowners, (& how to remedy this if so), & of course, what I asked above...did we get a better deal than we thought?
Any input would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
-Tracey