cinnamonstick
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2009
- Messages
- 572
Hello,
My dream ring is in process of being made
Inspiration was pulled from Yessies stunning 5 stone, VC's Jana, with a few personal touches for my taste.
For my ring, I am desiring a more substantial/wider shank. I would like the ring to have a little bit of "substance". In the attached photographs, it appears the VC ring has a shank that is as wide as the lowest diamond or *slightly* thinner. I know the center is a 2.3 ct. But I cannot locate any information on the sizes of the other diamonds in order to determine the width of the shank. Of course the photographs are also magnified which then throws me off a little more on mms.
My lowest diamonds are .18ct each (3.6mm). Others, if curious, are .41s each & center 2.16ct. I've been playing around with measurements and am feeling a 3.5mm shank may work. Therefore the ring will have a little bit about to it but still be feminine and light on the trellis portion. If the shank with is even with the lowest diamond width, I think the transition diamond yo shank would still look natural. Like the transition in the photograph below. I guess the only other option would be to make my bottom diamond a little larger to accommodate a wider shank. I'm not sure if that is necessary at this point.
Thank you for any help.




My dream ring is in process of being made
For my ring, I am desiring a more substantial/wider shank. I would like the ring to have a little bit of "substance". In the attached photographs, it appears the VC ring has a shank that is as wide as the lowest diamond or *slightly* thinner. I know the center is a 2.3 ct. But I cannot locate any information on the sizes of the other diamonds in order to determine the width of the shank. Of course the photographs are also magnified which then throws me off a little more on mms.
My lowest diamonds are .18ct each (3.6mm). Others, if curious, are .41s each & center 2.16ct. I've been playing around with measurements and am feeling a 3.5mm shank may work. Therefore the ring will have a little bit about to it but still be feminine and light on the trellis portion. If the shank with is even with the lowest diamond width, I think the transition diamond yo shank would still look natural. Like the transition in the photograph below. I guess the only other option would be to make my bottom diamond a little larger to accommodate a wider shank. I'm not sure if that is necessary at this point.
Thank you for any help.



