Iceman_India
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2018
- Messages
- 14
Thanks blueMA. Is something like this stone a reasonable benchmark for that one, in terms of thinking about the right price?
https://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3639112.htm
I'm seeing it at supposedly the wholesaler. Unsure how these 'wholesale' prices compare to websites.
Based on the stats for the two stones, is it your view that the WF one is meaningfully better? Such that unless the other one is 10% cheaper or more, I should avoid it?
I'm seeing it at supposedly the wholesaler. Unsure how these 'wholesale' prices compare to websites.
I am going to have a different view than you have been given so far.
First, LOOK AT THE DIAMOND! Only your eyes will know if they look at it or not. If at all possible, ask your chosen jeweler to place at least two and preferably more diamonds on a slotted tray without telling you anything about the diamonds. Then, using only your eyes, pick your best or least favorite diamond. Almost all of my in house clients will pick out the least favorite and we keep going until there are only two or three and at that time the eye will choose THE ONE.
side note: It has been my experience, that if you are in a location that can show you both super ideal cut diamonds and generic cut diamonds that your eyes will immediately choose to delete the generic cut diamonds. In one five diamond comparison held in a retail store in Houston, there were three super ideal cut diamonds and two AGS0 cut diamonds that were significantly less expensive than the super ideals. I had been told not to bother sending the super ideals, as they were 10% more and there was no way it was worth the money. I told the client that he had to choose between the two non super ideals anyway, he might as well see what he was missing, as it was not costing him a dime. When the five diamonds were placed randomly on the tray, the client looked at them and commented that two of them just did not seem to sparkle as well as the other three. The jeweler removed them from the tray. Then the guy got a little gray around the gills and said, "Please don't tell me that those were the two I said I was going to choose from." They were. He bought the largest remaining diamond that was $500 cheaper than the other two because it was an SI1 that he told me not to bother sending because he had read that SI1 were not worthy. It was larger and thus had larger flashes of white and colored light and believe me, when it comes to sparkle, bigger is wonderful! Oh, he chose the largest one before he knew the prices.
end side note:
Nearly always, THE ONE will not be within the narrow parameters that were chosen by reading about the paper grades. Rather it will be chosen by your eye because of something within the diamond speaking to you about how perfect it is. Often it will be a slightly lower color than you thought you had to have, but significantly larger than you thought you could afford.
Since the vast majority of my business is not with local clients, I am always pleasantly gratified with the many reports from clients when they receive their diamonds that it is even more beautiful than they expected. This is even more gratifying when it is a client who has purchased a diamond from me, on approval, that is one or two color grades lower than they were "willing" to go in order to reach a minimum desired size.
Although almost everyone will tell you how important the color and clarity are, it is really about the CUT! Cut trumps all but the most egregious color and clarity issues.
Q color, the knee jerk reaction is YUCH! The truth is that it is a rich buttery warmth. Probably not for most, but as a recent thread here showed, a magnificent opportunity for something completely different than what you see every day.
D, E, F colors? Stark cold white, very expensive, very desired, yet in blind taste tests, not the most chosen. For those that do choose them, they are what their eyes liked best. One of my in-house clients looked wistfully at the J color and said, "I wish I could love that color, it is so much larger than this D. (I try to show similarly priced diamonds in these showings.)
This is why it is important that you allow your eyes to see and do the choosing rather than choosing what you have read is the best for you.
In my opinion, it is important to first look at the diamond, then look at the report to see what it is that you have chosen. It is only a piece of paper, and yes, if you love cut, it should most likely be an AGS0 cut grade unless you know enough about cutting to judge if the GIA report is at least in the neighborhood of a truly well cut diamond, not the 68% of all of the diamonds on the market that GIA says are Excellent cut. Trust me, do your research and you will soon agree that the GIA Excellent cut grade is only right a very small percentage of the time. The cutters make too much money cutting to fat semi lifeless numbers that they can sell "cheaper" per carat for a diamond that is very much not Excellent, in spite of the paper saying it is. If the cutter can cut it fat enough to cross a price break barrier, say 1.00 carat, they can sell the stone for MUCH more than it is worth while bragging about their low pricing. Please DO NOT be fooled by this.
Still the report is your friend, especially when it is correct in identifying the probable light performance of the diamond. If the mapping of the inclusions has been done correctly, it is also your friend in giving comfort, as you can use that report to verify that the diamond you get back after setting, or after having your ring sized is in fact the same diamond that you left with the jeweler. I always recommend to people that they look at their diamond under a microscope when they leave it with someone for work. If no microscope, go find a jeweler that has at least this basic piece of equipment. Let your jeweler know that you will be looking again when you pick it up. That way the jeweler knows that there will not be any wrongful claims of switching and you know that there will not be any switching. If the jeweler is insulted, repeat the act found just after no microscope.
As for clarity, hmmm? If you want a VVS or an IF, cool, get one. If you want an SI1 or SI2, fine, get one. If you want to tell me your definition of eye clean includes from the side, fine, tell me and I will tell you what I see. I will not waste my time arguing with you, but you should perhaps spend a little of your time looking at some SI1-SI2 diamonds from the top. If the side view that has barely discernible inclusions bothers you, then get a smaller diamond or a more expensive one at the size you want. Those are personal taste issues and I personally will try never to be guilty of trying to tell you what you "should" want. I should be better than that, so I know how hard "should" is.
What I do know however is this. When you are looking at diamonds without knowing what they are, you will NOT be able to see the difference between Flawless and VS2, and from the top, between Flawless and SI1and most SI2 unless you have incredible, way younger than me, eyes. I fondly remember the days when my close up without glasses vision was nearly 2x. I never could see well at ten inches without my glasses, but man, I could see the heck out of things at four inches.
So, when you look at diamonds, choose the one you like the best, will you suddenly hate it if it is an SI1? Perhaps. Some do. They even tell me that it is only in their minds, but I always respect the fact that it is their mind, not mine. Most, however, are grateful to have found the diamond that they love, at a size that is bigger than they thought they could afford and just change that mind clean thing to a more inclusive mind clean thing.
That choice, will be yours. You will however have seen some diamonds that you may or may not like that are possibly way different than anything you ever thought about seeing. When you are done choosing, most likely, you will be much happier than if you chose on paper first and only then saw the diamonds.
Wink