Any inputs for this Round diamond? Image included.

[kaaty]

I guess the numbers are not ideal (Table,crown/pavilion angle combo etc.) but HCA eval came out good.
Any input is much appreciated.
Factor Grade
Light Return Very Good
Fire Excellent
Scintillation Very Good
Spread
or diameter for weight Very Good
Total Visual Performance 1.9 - Excellent
within FIC range

___________________________________

Measurements: 8.07 - 8.10 x 5.07 mm
Carat Weight: 2.03 carat
Color Grade: G
Clarity Grade: SI2
Cut Grade: Excellent
PROPORTIONS

Depth: 62.7%
Table: 54%
Crown Angle: 36.0°
Crown Height: 16.5%
Pavilion Angle: 40.6°
Pavilion Depth: 42.5%
Star Length: 50%
Lower Half: 75%
Girdle: Medium to Slightly Thick, Faceted (3.5%)
Culet: None
FINISH

Polish: Excellent
Symmetry: Excellent
Fluorescence: Faint
COMMENTS
Additional clouds are not shown. Pinpoints are not shown.

 

[Lula]

I'm wondering if it will be eye-clean; the inclusion is very easy to spot in the photo and the diamond is quite large. Will a visible inclusion bother you? Is this diamond from a vendor that has viewed the diamond and given you information about how visible the inclusion is? Also, the photo of the diamond does not seem to match the numbers -- for example, the table seems much larger than 54%. Can you check the number for the table and let us know if 54 is correct? The lower half number seems to be off as well. A FIC diamond is a diamond with a high crown and shallow pavilion -- they tend to show a lot of colored flash and lesser amounts of smaller pinpoints of white/colored sparkle.

 

[kaaty]

Lula, thanks for quick reply.
Site rep said "The inclusion are not easily visible to naked eyes."
Also, i got the numbers from the actualGIA certificate. Could it be wrong?

 

[yssie]

Ditto Lula - that table and pav combo is definitely not for this diamond! The size of the table reflection makes that very clear - pav is much higher than 40.6, and if that's the case the higher crown doesn't fit. LGF looks too long as well, but that could be rounded.

Wrong pic, probably.

 

[Lula]

Lula, thanks for quick reply.
Site rep said "The inclusion are not easily visible to naked eyes."
Also, i got the numbers from the actualGIA certificate. Could it be wrong?

I'm sure the report is correct; the photo does not match the report, though. Ask your rep if they mixed up the photo for this diamond. FIC stones are pretty stones -- no worries there. But I suspect the photo is for a different diamond.

 

[kaaty]

i have asked the rep to check. thanks.