Another request for advice

[Mr T]

I would appreciate any opinions on the following stones from WF. Is the step up in clarity worth the higher price? This stone will be set in a very simple platinum cathedral if that makes any difference.

Thank you!


http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/compare.aspx?idnos=2623357,2385565,2568955

 

[vintagelover229]

Hi!
You won't be able to tell with your eyes the difference between the clarity to the stones you've linked to. So no, I personally wouldn't pay for the VVS over the VS quality.

However you can same the same for the F color that you are getting. You could go down to G or H and it's still considered a white stone and most people won't be able to see the difference between them. However I do love the iceness of an F and some people are color sensitive or just like it for whatever reason

Good luck! Can't go wrong with WF, your in good hands

 

[yssie]

Wouldn't bother w/ VVS, certainly, VS1 will be eyeclean to the nitpickiest specifications in this size.

I prefer the patterning and smaller tables of the VS1s anyway - really liking the third one http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/princess-cut-loose-diamond-2623357.htm

 

[Mr T]

Thank you for the advice. I have opened a dialogue with Liza at WF and will see where it takes me.

Does the higher depth % of the third stone translate into a smaller face up?

 

[slg47]

Thank you for the advice. I have opened a dialogue with Liza at WF and will see where it takes me.

Does the higher depth % of the third stone translate into a smaller face up?

no, you can compare measurements

diamond 1: 5.49-5.44

diamond 2: 5.43-5.40

diamond 3: 5.46-5.41

I also prefer diamond 3 the newer ACAs seem to have this smaller table? The VVS1 is my least favorite, and overkill in clarity for me, personally. But I think the ASET on the other 2 looks better.