Bluehammer
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2006
- Messages
- 104
Whiteflash has recently added some stones this past week. They are ACA and appear to be Classic Line according to the IS. My question is:
The IS images seem to have a lot of white showing especially in the table. I think this would indicate more contrast due to leakage, but it seems to be much more than I usually see on WF. Could these newer stones not be as tightly cut or is the extra white around the table (etc.) just a result of photography?
Here are some examples:
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/A-Cut-Above-H-A-cut-diamond-2458431.htm#
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/A-Cut-Above-H-A-cut-diamond-2458432.htm#
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/A-Cut-Above-H-A-cut-diamond-2458433.htm#
Thanks.
The IS images seem to have a lot of white showing especially in the table. I think this would indicate more contrast due to leakage, but it seems to be much more than I usually see on WF. Could these newer stones not be as tightly cut or is the extra white around the table (etc.) just a result of photography?
Here are some examples:
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/A-Cut-Above-H-A-cut-diamond-2458431.htm#
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/A-Cut-Above-H-A-cut-diamond-2458432.htm#
http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/A-Cut-Above-H-A-cut-diamond-2458433.htm#
Thanks.