Hi, first of all, thanks for reading this. I've been looking at engagement rings and diamonds now for a few months and have learned so much from this site and all of the users on the forum. Since this will be the second largest purchase I have ever made (behind my home and yes ahead of my car), I have tried my best to learn as much as possible before diving in. I am looking for a great round diamond to be set in a classic cathedral solitaire white gold ring. Having looked at a few diamonds in a B&M store (featuring Lazare diamonds), I feel like I am getting close to figuring out what she would like! Knowing my girlfriend, I am fairly certain the order of importance when it comes to the 4 c's would be 1. Cut, 2. Color, 3. Carat, 4. Clarity. She wants something that shines like crazy but isn't the type to need to brag about size. With a budget of $13000 (that could be stretched some if needed), I've come across the following and would love for some opinions as well as other suggestions if anyone has any.
http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3244534.htm
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamonds/diamond-details/1.312-g-vs2-round-diamond-ags-104074500012
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/12675/
One other question if someone would like to chime in: It is often stressed that it is important to work with a company with idealscope images as well as (especially for a beginner like myself) to look for the Hearts and Arrows, Signature, Cut Above. To ensure good cut. Is this really that much better than say the Signature Ideal that another site may offer? Does compromising clarity to increase carat on a diamond similar to the ones above make sense? Meaning if you need a microscope to see any imperfections, would it make sense to just go larger since odds are we wont be showing the ring to many people with microscopes? Thank you to all the PS users for your wealth of knowledge!
http://www.whiteflash.com/loose-diamonds/round-cut-loose-diamond-3244534.htm
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamonds/diamond-details/1.312-g-vs2-round-diamond-ags-104074500012
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/12675/
One other question if someone would like to chime in: It is often stressed that it is important to work with a company with idealscope images as well as (especially for a beginner like myself) to look for the Hearts and Arrows, Signature, Cut Above. To ensure good cut. Is this really that much better than say the Signature Ideal that another site may offer? Does compromising clarity to increase carat on a diamond similar to the ones above make sense? Meaning if you need a microscope to see any imperfections, would it make sense to just go larger since odds are we wont be showing the ring to many people with microscopes? Thank you to all the PS users for your wealth of knowledge!