Demelza
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2004
- Messages
- 2,327
Date: 2/4/2006 9:15:20 PM
Author: diamondstud
Yes, the AGS and the incription match. The inclusion map was dead on. The diameter he had was .06 less than what was on the report. He also had one of the numbers at 33, rather than the 34 the AGS says it is. His response about the symmetry was that AGS isn't as good of a report as the GIA. And that my stone as an AGS 0 would be a GIA of 1?
scott
Rich -- would you agree with this appraiser's claim that AGS is not as reputable a lab as GIA? I always thought they were on par. If anything, I guess I would have said that AGS is even a bit better?? What do you say??