I an in the process of seaching for an engagement ring/diamond for my longtime gf. Naturally, the first thing that came up when purchasing diamonds online was certification. I've done a lot of research with the help of pricescope. At first, i thought that GIA was a MUST because of how popular the certificate is. There are a lot more GIA certification then there are AGS. I also found that GIA and AGS are comparable. However, based on further research, i find that a AGS certification is far more superior for the following reasons.
1) More strict guidelines - AGS grades from 0-10 (0 being Ideal) and GIA grades from Poor-Exellent. The top grade from AGS-Ideal will always be GIA-Exellent, but a GIA-Exellent is not always a AGS-Ideal.
2) AGS has a Light Perfomance grade. It measures the diamond based on Light Performance whereas GIA measures the diamond based on the diamonds Proportions. To me isn't a Light Performance a better measurement of how much a diamond shines? GIA only gives the proportion of the diamond, this is much harder to determine if the diamond is ideal (although we can use HCA).
3) AGS has a computer generated light performanc image of the diamond. This helps me look to see if the diamond has good light return, proportions, and good arrows.
Given this, wouldn't it be a slam dunk to go with an AGS Platium DQD if im looking for a good quality round diamond? I'm not saying that GIA is no good, i'm just saying that AGS is better. I have a higher chance of finding a good diamond and weeding out the bad ones with an AGS report. Am i wrong to say thing? Any criticism or support of my statement would be greatly appreciated.
1) More strict guidelines - AGS grades from 0-10 (0 being Ideal) and GIA grades from Poor-Exellent. The top grade from AGS-Ideal will always be GIA-Exellent, but a GIA-Exellent is not always a AGS-Ideal.
2) AGS has a Light Perfomance grade. It measures the diamond based on Light Performance whereas GIA measures the diamond based on the diamonds Proportions. To me isn't a Light Performance a better measurement of how much a diamond shines? GIA only gives the proportion of the diamond, this is much harder to determine if the diamond is ideal (although we can use HCA).
3) AGS has a computer generated light performanc image of the diamond. This helps me look to see if the diamond has good light return, proportions, and good arrows.
Given this, wouldn't it be a slam dunk to go with an AGS Platium DQD if im looking for a good quality round diamond? I'm not saying that GIA is no good, i'm just saying that AGS is better. I have a higher chance of finding a good diamond and weeding out the bad ones with an AGS report. Am i wrong to say thing? Any criticism or support of my statement would be greatly appreciated.